Abstract
AbstractStudying the early stages of the introduction of non-indigenous species (NIS) is crucial as it allows immediate management actions aimed at preventing NIS spread at a time when these actions are more likely to be effective. Recent species introductions present unique opportunities to study key aspects of the invasion process. However, comprehensive information on how and when NIS are first introduced remains rare. We assessed the characteristics of the introduction of a member of the widespread Pyura stolonifera species group (Chordata, Tunicata) in Europe. These ascidians are important bioengineer species that can attain amongst the highest benthic biomass per surface area ever reported. We collected introduced individuals on the coast of the northwestern Iberian Peninsula, an area with high shipping traffic and one of the world’s most important mussel farming regions. The specimens were analysed using taxonomic and genetic tools. Both field surveys and taxonomic analysis showed that one of the African members of the species group, Pyura herdmani, has recently been introduced to Europe and, although it does not yet form the large aggregates found in the native range, it is already well-established. Genetic data revealed that only the northwest African lineage of P. herdmani has been introduced to Europe. Considering the low dispersal capabilities of the early life-history stages of P. herdmani, the introduction of this species into Europe can only be explained via human mediated transport of NIS. In order to prevent any detrimental effects on both native biota and/or economically-important anthropogenic activities, regular monitoring of recent NIS introductions is urgently required.
Funder
Xunta de Galicia
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Assemble
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Arenas F, Bishop JDD, Carlton JT, Dyrynda PJ, Farnham WF, Gonzalez DJ, Jacobs MW, Lambert C, Lambert G, Nielsen SE, Pederson JA, Porter JS, Ward S, Wood CA (2006) Alien species and other notable records from a rapid assessment survey of marinas on the south coast of England. J Mar Biol Assoc 86:1329–1337
2. Atalah J, Fletcher LM, Forrest BM (2021) Impacts of a putative invasive ascidian on rocky shore communities. Mar Environ Res 168:105308
3. Bandelt H, Forster H, Rohl A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 16:37–48
4. Bañón R, Almón B, Trigo J, Pérez-Dieste J (2019) Especies marinas exóticas e inmigrantes en las costas de Galícia. In: Especies exóticas invasoras. Editorial Universidad de Alcalá, pp 81–94
5. Carver CE, Chisholm A, Mallet AL (2003) Strategies to mitigate the impact of Ciona intestinalis (L.) biofouling on shellfish production. J Shellfish Res 22:621–631