Risk–benefit ratio of percutaneous kyphoplasty and percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with vertebral fracture: a single-center retrospective study
-
Published:2023-03-30
Issue:6
Volume:102
Page:1513-1522
-
ISSN:0939-5555
-
Container-title:Annals of Hematology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ann Hematol
Author:
Xiang Qiu-Qing, Chu Bin, Lu Min-Qiu, Shi Lei, Gao Shan, Wang Yu-Tong, Fang Li-Juan, Ding Yue-Hua, Zhao Xin, Chen Yuan, Wang Meng-Zhen, Hu Wei-Kai, Wang Li-Fang, Sun Kai, Bao LiORCID
Abstract
AbstractThe indications for percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) are painful vertebral compression fractures. Our study is to assess the risk–benefit ratio of PKP/PVP surgery in the patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) without receiving antimyeloma therapy. The clinical data of 426 consecutive patients with NDMM admitted to our center from February 2012 to April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The baseline data, postoperative pain relief, the proportion of recurrent vertebral fractures, and survival time were compared between the PKP/PVP surgical group and the nonsurgical group in the NDMM patients. Of the 426 patients with NDMM, 206 patients had vertebral fractures (206/426, 48.4%). Of these, 32 (32/206, 15.5%) underwent PKP/PVP surgery for misdiagnosis of simple osteoporosis prior to diagnosis of MM (surgical group), and the other 174 (174/206, 84.5%) did not undergo surgical treatment prior to definitive diagnosis of MM (non-surgical group). The median age of patients in the surgical and nonsurgical groups was 66 and 62 years, respectively (p = 0.01). The proportion of patients with advanced ISS and RISS stages was higher in the surgical group (ISS stage II + III 96.9% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.03; RISS stage III 96.9% vs. 71%, p = 0.01). Postoperatively, 10 patients (31.3%) never experienced pain relief and 20 patients (62.5%) experienced short-term pain relief with a median duration of relief of 2.6 months (0.2–24.1 months). Postoperative fractures of vertebrae other than the surgical site occurred in 24 patients (75%) in the surgical group, with a median time of 4.4 months postoperatively (0.4–86.8 months). Vertebral fractures other than the fracture site at the first visit occurred in 5 patients (2.9%) in the nonoperative group at the time of diagnosis of MM, with a median time of 11.9 months after the first visit (3.5–12.6 months). The incidence of secondary fractures was significantly higher in the surgical group than in the nonsurgical group (75% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.001). The time interval between the first visit and definitive diagnosis of MM was longer in the surgical group than in the nonsurgical group (6.1 months vs. 1.6 months, p = 0.01). At a median follow-up of 32 months (0.3–123 months), median overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in the surgical group than in the nonsurgical group (48.2 months vs. 66 months, p = 0.04). Application of PKP/PVP surgery for pain relief in NDMM patients without antimyeloma therapy has a limited effect and a high risk of new vertebral fractures after surgery. Therefore, patients with NDMM may need to have their disease controlled with antimyeloma therapy prior to any consideration for PKP/PVP surgery.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Hematology,General Medicine
Reference41 articles.
1. Moreau P, San Miguel J, Sonneveld P, Mateos MV, Zamagni E, Avet-Loiseau H, Hajek R, Dimopoulos MA, Ludwig H, Einsele H, Zweegman S, Facon T, Cavo M, Terpos E, Goldschmidt H, Attal M, Buske C, Committee EG (2017) Multiple myeloma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 28(4):iv52–iv61. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx096 2. Terpos E, Zamagni E, Lentzsch S, Drake MT, Garcia-Sanz R, Abildgaard N, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Schjesvold F, de la Rubia J, Kyriakou C, Hillengass J, Zweegman S, Cavo M, Moreau P, San-Miguel J, Dimopoulos MA, Munshi N, Durie BGM, Raje N, Bone Working Group of the International Myeloma Working G (2021) Treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease: recommendations from the Bone Working Group of the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol 22(3):e119–e130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30559-3 3. Kumar SK, Callander NS, Adekola K, Anderson L, Baljevic M, Campagnaro E, Castillo JJ, Chandler JC, Costello C, Efebera Y, Faiman M, Garfall A, Godby K, Hillengass J, Holmberg L, Htut M, Huff CA, Kang Y, Hultcrantz M, Larson S, Liedtke M, Martin T, Omel J, Shain K, Sborov D, Stockerl-Goldstein K, Weber D, Keller J, Kumar R (2020) Multiple Myeloma, Version 3.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 18(12):1685–1717. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2020.0057 4. Anderson K, Ismaila N, Kyle RA (2018) Role of bone-modifying agents in multiple myeloma: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update Summary. J Oncol Pract 14(4):266–269. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.17.00013 5. Terpos E, Kleber M, Engelhardt M, Zweegman S, Gay F, Kastritis E, van de Donk NW, Bruno B, Sezer O, Broijl A, Bringhen S, Beksac M, Larocca A, Hajek R, Musto P, Johnsen HE, Morabito F, Ludwig H, Cavo M, Einsele H, Sonneveld P, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, European Myeloma N (2015) European Myeloma Network guidelines for the management of multiple myeloma-related complications. Haematol 100(10):1254–1266. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2014.117176
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|