Impact of residual tumor cells in the stem cell collection on multiple myeloma patients receiving autologous stem cell transplantation
-
Published:2023-09-08
Issue:11
Volume:102
Page:3195-3204
-
ISSN:0939-5555
-
Container-title:Annals of Hematology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Ann Hematol
Author:
Xu Jingyu, Yan Wenqiang, Fan Huishou, Liu Jiahui, Li Lingna, Du Chenxing, Deng Shuhui, Sui Weiwei, Xu Yan, Qiu Lugui, An GangORCID
Abstract
AbstractAutologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard therapy for patients with transplant-eligible multiple myeloma (TEMM). However, the ideal depth of response required before ASCT and the impact of residual tumor cells in the stem cell collection (SCC) on survival remains unclear. Here we collected data of 89 patients with TEMM undergoing ASCT and analyzed the minimal residual disease of SCC (cMRD) and bone marrow (BM) (mMRD) before transplantation. Before ASCT, 31.5% and 76.4% of patients achieved MRD negativity in BM and SCC, respectively. Tumor cells were less in SCC samples than that in BM samples. Neoplastic cells in SCC could be observed in patients with different responses after induction therapy, and there were no significant differences in the percentage and level of cMRD among these subgroups (P > 0.05). No correlation was found between the cMRD status and the response patients achieved after ASCT (P > 0.05). The median follow-up was 26.8 months. mMRD negativity before ASCT was associated with longer PFS (55.9 vs. 27.1 months; P = 0.009) but not OS (not reached vs. 58.9 months; P = 0.115). Patients with different cMRD statuses before ASCT experienced similar PFS (40.5 vs. 76.4 months for negativity vs. positivity; P = 0.685) and OS (not reached vs. 58.8 months for negativity vs. positivity; P = 0.889). These results suggested that detectable cMRD does not significantly predict the inferior post-ASCT response or shorter survival, and patients are eligible to undergo ASCT upon achieving partial response.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Hematology,General Medicine
Reference34 articles.
1. van de Donk NWCJ, Pawlyn C, Yong KL (2021) Multiple myeloma. Lancet 397(10272):410–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00135-5 2. Moreau P, Hulin C, Macro M, Caillot D, Chaleteix C, Roussel M, Garderet L, Royer B, Brechignac S, Tiab M, Puyade M, Escoffre M, Stoppa AM, Facon T, Pegourie B, Chaoui D, Jaccard A, Slama B, Marit G et al (2016) VTD is superior to VCD prior to intensive therapy in multiple myeloma: results of the prospective IFM2013-04 trial. Blood 127(21):2569–2574. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-01-693580 3. Durie BGM, Hoering A, Abidi MH, Rajkumar SV, Epstein J, Kahanic SP, Thakuri M, Reu F, Reynolds CM, Sexton R, Orlowski RZ, Barlogie B, Dispenzieri A (2017) Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma without intent for immediate autologous stem-cell transplant (SWOG S0777): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 389(10068):519–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31594-x 4. Mikhael J, Ismaila N, Cheung MC, Costello C, Dhodapkar MV, Kumar S, Lacy M, Lipe B, Little RF, Nikonova A, Omel J, Peswani N, Prica A, Raje N, Seth R, Vesole DH, Walker I, Whitley A, Wildes TM, Wong SW, Martin T (2019) Treatment of multiple myeloma: ASCO and CCO Joint Clinical Practice Guideline. J clin oncol 37(14):1228–1263. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.18.02096 5. Kumar SK, Callander NS, Adekola K, Anderson L, Baljevic M, Campagnaro E, Castillo JJ, Chandler JC, Costello C, Efebera Y, Faiman M, Garfall A, Godby K, Hillengass J, Holmberg L, Htut M, Huff CA, Kang Y, Hultcrantz M, Larson S, Liedtke M, Martin T, Omel J, Shain K, Sborov D, Stockerl-Goldstein K, Weber D, Keller J, Kumar R (2020) Multiple myeloma, version 3.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in oncology. J natl compr canc netw 18(12):1685–1717. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2020.0057
|
|