Author:
Fizza Kaneez,Banerjee Abhik,Mitra Karan,Jayaraman Prem Prakash,Ranjan Rajiv,Patel Pankesh,Georgakopoulos Dimitrios
Abstract
AbstractThe rapid evolution of the Internet of Things (IoT) is making way for the development of several IoT applications that require minimal or no human involvement in the data collection, transformation, knowledge extraction, and decision-making (actuation) process. To ensure that such IoT applications (we term them autonomic) function as expected, it is necessary to measure and evaluate their quality, which is challenging in the absence of any human involvement or feedback. Existing Quality of Experience (QoE) literature and most QoE definitions focuses on evaluating application quality from the lens of human receiving application services. However, in autonomic IoT applications, poor quality of decisions and resulting actions can degrade the application quality leading to economic and social losses. In this paper, we present a vision, survey and future directions for QoE research in IoT. We review existing QoE definitions followed by a survey of techniques and approaches in the literature used to evaluate QoE in IoT. We identify and review the role of data from the perspective of IoT architectures, which is a critical factor when evaluating the QoE of IoT applications. We conclude the paper by identifying and presenting our vision for future research in evaluating the QoE of autonomic IoT applications.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Energy
Reference53 articles.
1. Manyika J, Chui M, Bughin J, Dobbs R, Bisson P, Marrs A. Disruptive technologies: advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. San Francisco: McKinsey Global Institute; 2013.
2. Georgakopoulos D, Jayaraman PP, Fazia M, Villari M, Ranjan R. Internet of Things and edge cloud computing roadmap for manufacturing. IEEE Cloud Comput. 2016;3(4):66–73.
3. Jayaraman PP, Yavari A, Georgakopoulos D, Morshed A, Zaslavsky A. Internet of things platform for smart farming: experiences and lessons learnt. Sensors. 2016;16(11):1884.
4. Forkan ARM, Montori F, Georgakopoulos D, Jayaraman PP, Yavari A, Morshed A. An industrial IoT solution for evaluating workers' performance via activity recognition; 2019. p. 1393–403.
5. Zhang L, Schultz MA, Cash R, Barrett DM, McCarthy MJ. Determination of quality parameters of tomato paste using guided microwave spectroscopy. Food Control. 2014;40:214–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.12.008.
Cited by
71 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献