Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
To provide readers with a compact account of ongoing academic and diplomatic debates about autonomy in weapons systems, that is, about the moral and legal acceptability of letting a robotic system to unleash destructive force in warfare and take attendant life-or-death decisions without any human intervention.
Recent Findings
A précis of current debates is provided, which focuses on the requirement that all weapons systems, including autonomous ones, should remain under meaningful human control (MHC) in order to be ethically acceptable and lawfully employed. Main approaches to MHC are described and briefly analyzed, distinguishing between uniform, differentiated, and prudential policies for human control on weapons systems.
Summary
The review highlights the crucial role played by the robotics research community to start ethical and legal debates about autonomy in weapons systems. A concise overview is provided of the main concerns emerging in those early debates: respect of the laws of war, responsibility ascription issues, violation of the human dignity of potential victims of autonomous weapons systems, and increased risks for global stability. It is pointed out that these various concerns have been jointly taken to support the idea that all weapons systems, including autonomous ones, should remain under meaningful human control (MHC). Main approaches to MHC are described and briefly analyzed. Finally, it is emphasized that the MHC idea looms large on shared control policies to adopt in other ethically and legally sensitive application domains for robotics and artificial intelligence.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Cagliari
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference78 articles.
1. Rudakevych P, Ciholas M. PackBot EOD firing system. SPIE Proceedings, Volume 5804, Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII. 2005.
2. Egozi A. Robotics: Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) ground robotic systems. Asia-Pac Defence Rep. 2016;42(7):46–7.
3. Wells P, Deguire D. TALON: a universal unmanned ground vehicle platform, enabling the mission to be the focus. SPIE Proceedings, Volume 5804, Unmanned Ground Vehicle Technology VII. 2005.
4. Visnevski NA, Castillo-Effen M. A UAS capability description framework: reactive, adaptive, and cognitive capabilities in robotics. 2009 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana. 2009.
5. Alston P. Report of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions. Addendum. Study on targeted killings. UN Doc. A/HRC/14/24/Add.6. 28 May 2010.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献