Abstract
AbstractWind tunnel experiments on the receptivity of three-dimensional boundary layers were performed in a range of freestream turbulence intensities, Tu, from 0.01%—the lowest level ever achieved in this type of work—up to 0.41%. This work confirms that for $$Tu=0.01\%$$
T
u
=
0.01
%
, and presumably below this level, the transition process is dominated by stationary modes. These are receptive to surface roughness and generate Type-I and Type-II secondary instabilities that eventually cause the transition to turbulence. The saturation amplitude of these stationary waves is highly sensitive to the level of environmental disturbances; the former is here recorded to be the highest in the literature, with the latter being the lowest. Travelling modes are still present; however, their influence on the transition process is marginal. At matched surface roughness levels, when the level of environmental disturbance is enhanced to $$Tu\ge 0.33\%$$
T
u
≥
0.33
%
, the travelling modes acquire more importance, strongly influencing the laminar/turbulent transition process, whilst the initial amplitude and growth of the stationary modes are hindered. For this level of Tu, is the interaction of steady and unsteady disturbances that produces highly amplified waves (Type-III), that quickly lead to nonlinear growth and anticipated turbulence. Finally, a simple rule of thumb is proposed, where the transition front was found to move forward by roughly $$10\%$$
10
%
chord for an increase in one order of magnitude in the Tu levels.
Graphical abstract
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Innovate UK
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,General Physics and Astronomy,Mechanics of Materials,Computational Mechanics
Reference71 articles.
1. Atkin CJ (2004) Calculation of laminar boundary layers on swept-tapered wings. Technical Report Report FST/TR025107. QinetiQ Ltd
2. Atkin CJ, Poll DIA (1996) Correlation between linear stability analysis and crossflow transition near an attachment line. North-Holland, Amsterdam
3. Baranov SA, Chernyshev SL, Khomich VY, Kiselev AP, Kuryachii AP, Moshkunov SI, Rebrov IE, Sboev DS, Tolkachev SN, Yamshchikov VA (2021) Experimental cross-flow control in a 3D boundary layer by multi-discharge plasma actuators. Aerosp Sci Technol 112:106643
4. Bertolotti FP (2000) Receptivity of three-dimensional boundary-layers to localized wall roughness and suction. Phys Fluids 12(7):1799–1809. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.870428
5. Bippes H, Lerche, T (1997) Transition prediction in three-dimensional boundary-layer flows unstable to crossflow instability. . In: AIAA—28th fluid dynamics conference, Snowmass Village, CO, USA. AIAA, pp 97–1906
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献