Author:
Addae Prince Christopher,Bruce Y. Anani,Utono Iliyasu M.,Abudulai Mumuni,Traore Fousseni,Ishiyaku Mohammad F.,Adamu Rabiu S.,Seidu Ahmed,Batieno Benoît J.,Nwankwo Onyekachi Francis,Ba Malick N.,Adazebra Gloria A.,Tignegre Jean Baptiste,Dabiré-Binso Clémentine L.,Huesing Joseph E.,Hellmich Richard L.,Pittendrigh Barry R.,Tamò Manuele
Abstract
AbstractThe evolution of resistance to the Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins by insect pests is a major threat to Bt technology. However, the rate of resistance can be slowed with appropriate integrated insect resistance management (IRM) strategies. Surveys were conducted to identify alternate host species for Maruca vitrata (commonly called the legume pod borer or Maruca) that could serve as refuges for Pod-Borer Resistant (PBR) cowpea in three West African countries (Ghana, Nigeria, and Burkina Faso). Survey sites included 25 in northern Ghana, 44 in northern Nigeria, and 52 in north-central and southwestern Burkina Faso. Alternate hosts of Maruca identified from plant species belonging to the Fabaceae family that showed signs of Maruca damage on cowpea tissues were collected and dissected. Larvae that were found during these dissections were reared to adult moths in the laboratory then identified to species. The alternate host plants including species of Crotolaria, Sesbania, Tephrosia, and Vigna were the most frequently encountered among sites and locations. Flowering and podding of these plants overlapped with flowering and podding of the nearby (~200 m) cowpea crop. Abundance of these wild hosts and overlapping flowering patterns with the cowpea crop in most locations have the potential to sustain ample numbers of Bt susceptible Maruca that will mate with possible resistant Maruca and deter resistance development. Further quantitative studies, however, are required from each location to determine if actual Maruca production from alternate hosts is sufficient for a PBR IRM strategy. If verified, this approach would be compatible with the high dose/refuge IRM strategy that includes alternate hosts and non-Bt crops as refuges.
Funder
USAID
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Insect Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference35 articles.
1. Abudulai M, Shepard BM (2003) Cowpea damage simulation to determine critical reproductive growth stages. J Agric Urban Entomol 20:25–29. http://scentsoc.org/Volumes/JAUE/v20/25.pdf
2. Addae PC, Ishiyaku MF, Tignegre JB, Ba NM, Bationo JB, Atokple IDK, Abudulai M, Dabiré-Binso CL, Traore F, Saba M, Umar ML, Adazebra GA, Onyekachi FN, Nemeth MA, Huesing JE, Beach LR, Higgins TJV, Hellmich RL, Pittendrigh BR (2020) Efficacy of a cry1Ab gene for control of Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in cowpea (Fabales: Fabaceae). J Econ Ent 113:974–979. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toz367
3. Agunbiade TA, Coates BS, Datinon B, Djouaka R, Sun W, Tamò M, Pittendrigh BR (2014) Genetic differentiation among Maruca vitrata F. (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) populations on cultivated cowpea and wild host plants: implications for insect resistance management and biological control strategies. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092072
4. Akobundu IO (1987) Weed science in the tropics: principles and practices. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK
5. Akobundu IO, Agyakwa CW (1987) A handbook of West African weeds. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献