1. For complete bibliographical data on the problem of evil, see Barry L. Whitney,Theodicy: An Annotated Bibliography on the Problem of Evil, 1960?1990 (New York: Garland, 1993). See also Barry L. Whitney,What Are They Saying About God and Evil? (New York: Paulist, 1989) andEvil and the Process God (Lewsiton, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1985).
2. Hick is correct in arguing that Augustinian theodicy is the dominant theodicy of Christian theological history. See his classicEvil and the God of Love (New York: Harper and Row, 1966; 2nd ed., 1977). See also David Griffin's seminal writings,God, Power, and Evil: A Process Theodicy (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1976; republished by University Press of America, 1990);Evil Revisited: Responses and Reconsiderations (Albany: SUNY Press, 1991), etc.
3. Among the numerous critics who have argued this, see Hare and Madden,Evil and the Concept of God (Springfield: C.C. Thomas, 1968).
4. For references to the detailed discussions on this and related issues, see Barry L. Whitney,Theodicy: An Annotated Bibliography on the Problem of Evil, 1960?1990.
5. Hartshorne's attempts to resolve the theodicy issue by a priori theistic proofs is documented in Barry Whitney,Evil and the Process God. For a thorough discussion of Hartshorne's theistic proofs, see Donald Wayne Viney,Charles Hartshorne and the Existence of God (Albany: SUNY Press, 1985).