International consensus on the management of metastatic gastric cancer: step by step in the foggy landscape
-
Published:2024-04-18
Issue:4
Volume:27
Page:649-671
-
ISSN:1436-3291
-
Container-title:Gastric Cancer
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Gastric Cancer
Author:
Morgagni Paolo, Bencivenga MariaORCID, Carneiro Fatima, Cascinu Stefano, Derks Sarah, Di Bartolomeo Maria, Donohoe Claire, Eveno Clarisse, Gisbertz Suzanne, Grimminger Peter, Gockel Ines, Grabsch Heike, Kassab Paulo, Langer Rupert, Lonardi Sara, Maltoni Marco, Markar Sheraz, Moehler Markus, Marrelli Daniele, Mazzei Maria Antonietta, Melisi Davide, Milandri Carlo, Moenig Paul Stefan, Mostert Bianca, Mura Gianni, Polkowski Wojciech, Reynolds John, Saragoni Luca, Van Berge Henegouwen Mark I., Van Hillegersberg Richard, Vieth Michael, Verlato Giuseppe, Torroni Lorena, Wijnhoven Bas, Tiberio Guido Alberto Massimo, Yang Han-Kwang, Roviello Franco, de Manzoni Giovanni,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Many gastric cancer patients in Western countries are diagnosed as metastatic with a median overall survival of less than twelve months using standard chemotherapy. Innovative treatments, like targeted therapy or immunotherapy, have recently proved to ameliorate prognosis, but a general agreement on managing oligometastatic disease has yet to be achieved. An international multi-disciplinary workshop was held in Bertinoro, Italy, in November 2022 to verify whether achieving a consensus on at least some topics was possible.
Methods
A two-round Delphi process was carried out, where participants were asked to answer 32 multiple-choice questions about CT, laparoscopic staging and biomarkers, systemic treatment for different localization, role and indication of palliative care. Consensus was established with at least a 67% agreement.
Results
The assembly agreed to define oligometastases as a “dynamic” disease which either regresses or remains stable in response to systemic treatment. In addition, the definition of oligometastases was restricted to the following sites: para-aortic nodal stations, liver, lung, and peritoneum, excluding bones. In detail, the following conditions should be considered as oligometastases: involvement of para-aortic stations, in particular 16a2 or 16b1; up to three technically resectable liver metastases; three unilateral or two bilateral lung metastases; peritoneal carcinomatosis with PCI ≤ 6. No consensus was achieved on how to classify positive cytology, which was considered as oligometastatic by 55% of participants only if converted to negative after chemotherapy.
Conclusion
As assessed at the time of diagnosis, surgical treatment of oligometastases should aim at R0 curativity on the entire disease volume, including both the primary tumor and its metastases. Conversion surgery was defined as surgery on the residual volume of disease, which was initially not resectable for technical and/or oncological reasons but nevertheless responded to first-line treatment.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Verona
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference71 articles.
1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49. 2. Canadian Cancer Society’s Steering Committee on Cancer Statistics. Canadian cancer statistics 2011. 2011th ed. Toronto: Canadian Cancer Society; 2011. 3. Salati M, Valeri N, Spallanzani A, et al. Oligometastatic gastric cancer: an emerging clinical entity with distinct therapeutic implications. Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol. 2019;45:1479–82. 4. Nugent K, Good J. The oligometastatic paradigm and the role of radiotherapy. Clin Med Lond Engl. 2023;23:61–4. 5. Al-Batran SE, Homann N, Pauligk C, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection on survival in patients with limited metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: the AIO-FLOT3 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:1237–44.
|
|