1. Côté, C. (2014, February). A chilling effect? The impact of international investment agreements on national regulatory autonomy in the areas of health, safety and the environment. Ph.D. thesis, London School of Economics.
2. Hamamoto, S. (2013). Requiem for indirect expropriation: On the theoretical and practical uselessness of a contested concept. PILAGG e-series/IA/1, École de Droit, Sciences Po de Paris (pp. 1–28). http://blogs.sciences-po.fr/pilagg/pilagg-e-series/ . Also available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2666836
3. Hamamoto, S. (2014). Protection of the investor’s legitimate expectations: Intersection of a treaty obligation and a general principle of law. In S. Wenhua & S. Jinyuan (Eds.), China and international investment law (pp. 141–169). Leiden: Brill/Nijhoff.
4. Karamanian, S. L. (2016). International energy trade and investor-state arbitration: What role for sustainable development? In M. Matsuhista & T. Schoenbaum (Eds.), Emerging issues in sustainable development: International trade law and policy relating to natural resources, energy and the environment. Berlin: Springer.
5. Titi, A. (2014). The right to regulate in international investment law. Baden-Baden/Oxford: Nomos/Hart Pub.