Stellungnahme zu Acetaldehyd als Aromastoff: Aspekte der Risikobewertung
-
Published:2022-07-22
Issue:3
Volume:17
Page:285-293
-
ISSN:1661-5751
-
Container-title:Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety
-
language:de
-
Short-container-title:J Consum Prot Food Saf
Author:
Hengstler Jan G.ORCID, Baum Matthias, Cartus Alexander T., Diel Patrick, Eisenbrand Gerhard, Engel Karl-Heinz, Engeli Barbara, Epe Bernd, Grune Tilman, Guth Sabine, Haller Dirk, Heinz Volker, Hellwig Michael, Henle Thomas, Humpf Hans-Ulrich, Jäger Henry, Joost Hans-Georg, Kulling Sabine E., Lachenmeier Dirk W., Lampen Alfonso, Leist Marcel, Mally Angela, Marko Doris, Nöthlings Ute, Röhrdanz Elke, Roth Angelika, Spranger Joachim, Stadler Richard, Steinberg Pablo, Vieths Stefan, Wätjen Wim
Abstract
AbstractOpinion on acetaldehyde as a flavouring substance: considerations for risk assessmentAcetaldehyde occurs naturally in many foods and is also used as a flavouring due to its fruity aroma. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified acetaldehyde as possibly carcinogenic to humans and, in combination with oral intake via alcoholic beverages, as carcinogenic to humans. Therefore, the question arises whether the use of acetaldehyde as a flavouring agent is still justifiable. The Senate Commission on Food Safety (SKLM) of the German Research Foundation (DFG) reviewed the scientific basis for health risk assessment of the use of acetaldehyde as a flavouring substance and adopted an opinion. Based on the available data, it is at present not possible to conclude if acetaldehyde is genotoxic and mutagenic in vivo after oral exposure. There is also uncertainty regarding the contribution of acetaldehyde as a flavouring substance to the overall exposure to acetaldehyde. Therefore, a science-based assessment on health risk related to the use of acetaldehyde as a flavouring is not possible at present. Considering the genotoxic potential as well as numerous data gaps that need to be closed for a full risk assessment, the SKLM is concerned about the safety of acetaldehyde as a flavouring substance. For reasons of precautionary consumer protection, the SKLM considers that the use of acetaldehyde as a food additive should be re-evaluated.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Leibniz-Institut für Arbeitsforschung (IfADo)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science,Food Animals,Food Science,Biotechnology
Reference41 articles.
1. Balbo S, Hashibe M, Gundy S, Brennan P, Canova C, Simonato L, Merletti F, Richiardi L, Agudo A, Castellsague X et al. (2008) N2-ethyldeoxyguanosine as a potential biomarker for assessing effects of alcohol consumption on DNA. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 17(11):3026–3032. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0117 2. Balbo S, Meng L, Bliss RL, Jensen JA, Hatsukami DK, Hecht SS (2012a) Kinetics of DNA adduct formation in the oral cavity after drinking alcohol. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21(4):601–608. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-1175 3. Balbo S, Meng L, Bliss RL, Jensen JA, Hatsukami DK, Hecht SS (2012b) Time course of DNA adduct formation in peripheral blood granulocytes and lymphocytes after drinking alcohol. Mutagenesis 27(4):485–490. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/ges008 4. Balbo S, Juanes RC, Khariwala S, Baker EJ, Daunais JB, Grant KA (2016) Increased levels of the acetaldehyde-derived DNA adduct N 2-ethyldeoxyguanosine in oral mucosa DNA from Rhesus monkeys exposed to alcohol. Mutagenesis 31(5):553–558. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gew016 5. BfR (2010a) Statement of the BfR Committee on Food Additives, Flavourings and Processing Aids (LAV) on the use of acetaldehyde as flavouring substance. Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), Berlin, Germany. https://mobil.bfr.bund.de/cm/343/5_sitzung_der_bfr_kommission_fuer_lebensmittelzusatzstoffe_aromastoffe_und_verarbeitungshilfsstoffe.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2022
|
|