Zur Verhinderung der Eskalation von Cyberkonflikten: Ein Ansatz zum plausiblen Nachweis der Nichtbeteiligung an einem Cyberangriff

Author:

Reinhold ThomasORCID,Reuter ChristianORCID

Abstract

AbstractWhile cyberspace has evolved into a commonly shared space vital to our individual lives and societies, malicious cyber activities by state actors as part of espionage operations, regarding defense strategies, or as part of traditional conflicts have strongly increased. In contrast, attributing the origin of such activities remains problematic. The ambiguity of digital data raises the problem of misinterpreting available information, increasing the risk of misinformed reactions and conflict escalation. In order to reduce this risk, this paper proposes a transparency system based on technologies which usually already exist for IT security measures that an accused actor in a specific incident can use to provide credible information which plausibly assures his non-involvement. The paper analyses the technical requirements, presents the technical concept and discusses the necessary adjustments to existing IT networks for its implementation. Intended as a measure for conflict de-escalation, the paper further discusses the limitations of this approach, especially with regard to technical limits as well as the political motivation and behavior of states.

Funder

Technische Universität Darmstadt

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference71 articles.

1. Baezner, M. 2018. Regional rivalry between India-Pakistan: tit-for-tat in cyberspace. Zurich: Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich.

2. Baezner, M. 2019. Hotspot Analysis: Iranian cyber-activities in the context of regional rivalries and international tensions. Zurich: Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich.

3. Bargar, A., S. Pitts, J. Butkevics, and I. McCulloh. 2019. Challenges and opportunities to counter information operations through social network analysis and theory. In 2019 11th International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CyCon), 1–18. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/CYCON.2019.8756832.

4. SWP-Studie 17;A Bendiek,2021

5. Biermann, K. 2015. Vorratsdaten kosten mindestens 260 Mio. €. Zeit Online. https://www.zeit.de/digital/datenschutz/2015-10/vds-vorratsdatenspeicherung-millionen-kosten. Accessed 20 April 2023.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3