Author:
Lesnyak Olga,Svedbom Axel,Belova Ksenia,Dobrovolskaya Olga,Ershova Olga,Golubev Georgij,Grebenshikov Vyacheslav,Ivanov Sergej,Kochish Alexander,Menshikova Larissa,Nikitinskaya Oxana,Nurligayanov Radik,Solodovnikov Alexander,Toroptsova Natalia,Varavko Julia,Zotkin Eugenij,Borgstrom Fredrik,Kanis John A
Abstract
Abstract
Summary
Changes in health-related quality of life (QoL) due to hip, humeral, ankle, spine, and distal forearm fracture were measured in Russian adults age 50 years or more over the first 18 months after fracture. The accumulated mean QoL loss after hip fracture was 0.5 and significantly greater than after fracture of the distal forearm (0.13), spine (0.21), proximal humerus (0.26), and ankle (0.27).
Introduction
Data on QoL following osteoporotic fractures in Russia are scarce. The present study evaluated the impact of hip, vertebral, proximal humerus, distal forearm, and ankle fracture up to 18 months after fracture from the Russian arm of the International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study.
Methods
Individuals age ≥ 50 years with low-energy-induced humeral, hip, clinical vertebral, ankle, or distal forearm fracture were enrolled. After a recall of pre-fracture status, HRQoL was prospectively collected over 18 months of follow-up using EQ-5D-3L. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify determinants of QALYs loss.
Results
At 2 weeks, patients with hip fracture (n = 223) reported the lowest mean health state utility value (HSUV) compared with other fracture sites. Thereafter, utility values increased but remained significantly lower than before fracture. For spine (n = 183), humerus (n = 166), and ankle fractures (n = 214), there was a similar pattern of disutility with a nadir within 2 weeks and a progressive recovery thereafter. The accumulated mean QoL loss after hip fracture was 0.5 and significantly greater than after fracture of the distal forearm (0.13), spine (0.21), proximal humerus (0.26), and ankle (0.27). Substantial impairment in self-care and usual activities immediately after fracture were important predictors of recovery across at all fracture sites.
Conclusions
Fractures of the hip, vertebral, distal forearm, ankle, and proximal humerus incur substantial loss of QoL in Russia. The utility values derived from this study can be used in future economic evaluations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference35 articles.
1. Anonymous (1993) Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 94:646–650
2. World Health Organization (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: report of a WHO study group. WHO Technical Report Series, 843 Geneva: World Health Organization http://whqlibdocwhoint/trs/who_trs_843pdf accessed 23 June 2018
3. Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergård M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J, McCloskey EV, Jönsson B, Kanis JA (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporosi 8:136. Access: http://www.iofbonehealth.org/data-publications/regional-audits/osteoporosis-european-union-medical-management-epidemiology-and
4. Svedbom A, Hernlund E, Ivergård M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J, McCloskey EV, Jönsson B, Kanis JA, the EU review panel of the IOF (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: a compendium of country-specific reports. Arch Osteoporos 8:137
5. Kanis JA on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group (2008) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical Report. WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, UK
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献