Abstract
Abstract
Summary
Persistence with initial treatment was highest after 1 year, decreasing afterwards. Persistence was highest for denosumab followed by alendronate. We identified several factors associated with treatment persistence, some of which were the same irrespective of OTx agent, which could help target subgroups of patients in terms of social and healthcare support.
Purpose
To describe patient characteristics, persistence, and factors associated with the persistence of new users of the bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate, and ibandronate) and the RANKL inhibitor denosumab in Denmark.
Methods
A population-based cohort study using health registries (2010–2018). We included alendronate (n = 128,590), risedronate (n = 892), ibandronate (n = 5,855), and denosumab (n = 16,469) users, aged ≥ 50 years.
Results
The 1-year persistence was 68.2% in the alendronate cohort; 39.3% in the risedronate cohort; 56.3% in the ibandronate cohort; and 84.0% in the denosumab cohort. The 2-year persistence was 58.7% in the alendronate cohort; 28.0% in the risedronate cohort; 42.9% in the ibandronate cohort; and 71.9% in the denosumab cohort. The 4-year persistence was 46.3%, 15.4%, 29.6%, and 56.9%, respectively. Later years of treatment initiation were associated with lower persistence for alendronate (adjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI was 0.86 (0.81–0.91) in 2016 compared to 2010), but not for risedronate (OR was 1.56 (0.60–4.06), ibandronate (OR was 0.92 (0.71–1.19) or denosumab (OR was 1.11 (0.87–1.43). Older age was associated with higher persistence for all medications and the same goes for the female sex except for ibandronate. Dementia was associated with higher persistence for alendronate but not denosumab, whereas prior osteoporosis treatment (OT) was the opposite. Several comorbidities were associated with lower persistence for alendronate, but not denosumab.
Conclusion
Persistence was highest for denosumab followed by alendronate. We identified several factors associated with treatment persistence, some of which were the same irrespective of OTx agent, which could help target subgroups of patients in terms of social and healthcare support.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Reference33 articles.
1. Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergard M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J et al (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 8(1–2):136
2. Abrahamsen B, Skjodt MK, Vestergaard P (2019) Hip fracture rates and time trends in use of anti-osteoporosis medications in Denmark for the period 2005 to 2015: Missed opportunities in fracture prevention. Bone 120:476–481
3. Selskab DK (2009) Vejledning til udredning og behandling af osteoporose. https://www.endocrinology.dk. Accessed 10/01 2023
4. EMA. Prolia (denosumab) [Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/human/medicines/001120/human_med_001324.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058001d124. Accessed 10/01 2023
5. Kristensen PK, Ehrenstein V, Shetty N, Pedersen AB (2019) Use of anti-osteoporosis medication dispensing by patients with hip fracture: could we do better? Osteoporos Int 30(9):1817–1825
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献