Validation of a nuclear grading system for resected stage I–IIIA, high-risk, node-negative invasive breast carcinoma in the N·SAS-BC 01 trial
-
Published:2022-04-18
Issue:4
Volume:29
Page:720-729
-
ISSN:1340-6868
-
Container-title:Breast Cancer
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Breast Cancer
Author:
Tsuda HitoshiORCID, Kurosumi Masafumi, Akiyama Futoshi, Ohno Shinji, Saji Shigehira, Masuda Norikazu, Shimomura Akihiko, Sato Nobuaki, Takao Shintaro, Ohsumi Shozo, Tokuda Yutaka, Inaji Hideo, Watanabe Toru
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This retrospective observational study validated nuclear grading criteria developed to identify a high-risk group with recurrence rate ≥20–30% and local pathology diagnosis used in a previous multi-institutional randomized N·SAS-BC 01 trial, where the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens was evaluated in 733 high-risk node-negative invasive breast cancer patients.
Methods
Of 545 patients with long-term follow-up data (median 12.1 years), pathology slides, and local pathology diagnosis, 530 eligible patients were subjected to central pathology review (CPR) for histological type and nuclear grade (NG). Concordance in NGs was compared with local diagnosis. The 10/15-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates stratified by NG and histological type were calculated.
Results
Local diagnoses were invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC)-NG2, IDC-NG3, invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), and metaplastic carcinoma (MC) in 158/327/38/7 patients, respectively. The 10/15-year RFS rates were 87.2/82.6% for IDC-NG2 and 81.8/75.0% for IDC-NG3 (p = 0.061), and OS rates were 95.0/92.8% for IDC-NG2 and 90.8/85.7% for IDC-NG3 (p = 0.042). CPR graded 485 locally diagnosed IDCs as IDC-NG1/NG2/NG3/unknown in 98/116/267/4 patients, respectively. No significant difference was found among survival curves for the three NG groups. Although the agreement level between local and CPR diagnoses was low (κ = 0.311), both diagnoses identified a patient group with a 15-year recurrence rate ≥ 20%. The 10/15-year RFS rates were 79.4/63.5% for ILC and 68.6%/unknown for MC.
Conclusions
The N·SAS grading system identified a patient group with high-risk node-negative invasive breast cancer, suggesting that local diagnosis was performed efficiently in the N·SAS-BC 01 trial.
Trial registration number: UMIN000022571.
Date of registration: June 1, 2016.
Funder
Taiho Pharmaceutical
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology,General Medicine
Reference18 articles.
1. Ellis IO, Simpson JF, Reis-Filho JS, Decker T. Grading. In: Lakhani SR, Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Tan PH, van de Vijver MJ, editors. WHO Classification of tumours of the breast. 4th ed. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon; 2012. p. 19–20. 2. Rakha EA, Allison KH, Ellis IO, Horii R, Masuda S, Penault-Llorca F, et al. Invasive breast carcinoma: General overview. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board, editors. WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th ed. Breast Tumours. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon; 2019. p. 82–101 3. Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology. 1991;19:403–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.1991.tb00229.x. 4. Tsuda H, Akiyama F, Kurosumi M, Sakamoto G, Watanabe T. Establishment of histological criteria for high-risk node-negative breast carcinoma for a multi-institutional randomized clinical trial of adjuvant therapy. Japan National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Breast Cancer (NSAS-BC) Pathology Section. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1998;28:486–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/28.8.486. 5. Watanabe T, Sano M, Takashima S, Kitaya T, Tokuda Y, Yoshimoto M, et al. Oral uracil and tegafur compared with classic cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil as postoperative chemotherapy in patients with node-negative, high-risk breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Study for Breast Cancer 01 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1368–74. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.3939.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|