A prospective analysis of two studies that used the 5-mm interval slices and 5-mm margin-free method for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy
-
Published:2022-09-30
Issue:1
Volume:30
Page:131-138
-
ISSN:1340-6868
-
Container-title:Breast Cancer
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Breast Cancer
Author:
Ohsumi ShozoORCID, Nishimura Reiki, Masuda Norikazu, Akashi-Tanaka Sadako, Suemasu Kimito, Yamauchi Hideko, Tokunaga Eriko, Ikeda Tadashi, Nishi Tsunehiro, Hayashi Hiroto, Iino Yuichi, Takatsuka Yuichi, Ohashi Yasuo, Inaji Hideo
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy is one of standard treatments for early breast cancer. However, it is regarded as an option to treat elderly patients with small hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with breast-conserving surgery and hormone therapy without radiotherapy. We conducted two sequential prospective studies to examine the feasibility of breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy since 2002 and present the results.
Patients and methods
Primary female breast cancer patients who fulfilled the strict eligibility criteria were prospectively enrolled in two sequential studies named WORTH 1 and 2. The surgical materials were sliced in 5-mm intervals and all slices were examined microscopically. Postoperative radiotherapy was not allowed, but tamoxifen or anastrozole was administered for 5 years. Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR)-free survival was the primary outcome.
Results
The data of the two studies were combined (N = 321). The median follow-up period for IBTR was 94 months (4–192 months). Only three patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. The 5- and 10-year IBTR-free rates were 97.0% and 90.5%, respectively. The age at operation and PR status affected IBTR rates independently. When we calculated IBTR-free rates of patients who were 65 years of age or older at the time of surgery and had PR-positive tumors, the 5- and 10-year IBTR rates were both 98.4%.
Conclusions
Our “5-mm-thick slice and 5-mm free-margin” method may be effective to select patients who can be treated by breast-conserving surgery and hormone therapy without radiotherapy.
Funder
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Oncology,General Medicine
Reference22 articles.
1. Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Vecchio MD, Banfi A, Clemente C, De Lena M, et al. Comparison of radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancer of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:6–11. 2. Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, Poisson R, Pilch Y, Redmond C, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:665–73. 3. Sarrazin D, Le MG, Arriagada R, Contesso G, Fontaine F, Spielmann M, et al. Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer. Radiother Oncol. 1989;14:177–84. 4. Lichter AS, Lippman ME, Danforth DN, d’Angelo T, Steinberg SM, deMoss E, et al. Mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy in the treatment of stage I and II carcinoma of the breast: a randomized trial at the National Cancer Institute. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:976–83. 5. van Dongen JA, Bartelink H, Fentiman IS, Lerut T, Mignolet F, Olthuis G, et al. Randomized clinical trial to assess the value of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast cancer. EORTC 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1992; 11: 15–8.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|