Author:
Glomm Gerhard,Meier Volker
Abstract
AbstractWe model choices between caring for an infant at home or through some market provision of child care. Maternal labor supply necessitates child care purchased in the market. Households are distinguished along three dimensions: (i) exogenous income, (ii) the wage rate of the primary care giver and (iii) the quality which the primary caregiver provides for child care. The market can supply child care at varying qualities and in continuous amounts. All households value consumption and child care quality. Sources of market failure comprise taxation of labor and productivity impacts on child care not fully taken account of by parents. Optimal corrective subsidies are highly correlated with taxed paid by secondary earners. In a second-best environment, typical policies of subsidizing child care will also distort quality choices. Employing “no-use subsidies” mitigates such distortions and can also counter excessive levels of subsidies for external child care.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference31 articles.
1. Apps, P., & Rees, R. (2004). Fertility, taxation and family policy. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106(4), 745–763.
2. Apps, P., & Rees, R. (2018). Optimal family taxation and income inequality. International Tax and Public Finance, 25(5), 1093–1128.
3. Baker, M., Gruber, J., & Milligan, K. (2008). Universal child care, maternal labor supply and family wellbeing. Journal of Political Economy, 116(4), 709–745.
4. Bastani, S., Blomquist, S., & Micheletto, L. (2017). Child care subsidies, quality, and optimal income taxation. CESifo working paper No. 6533, Munich.
5. Bauernschuster, S., Hener, T., & Rainer, H. (2016). Children of a (policy) revolution: the introduction of universal child care and its effect on fertility. Journal of the European Economic Association, 14(4), 975–1005.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献