Bone finds and their medicolegal examination: a study from Hesse, Germany

Author:

Ohlwärther T. E. N.,Holz F.,Edler K.,Kölzer S. C.,Reuss E.,Verhoff M. A.,Birngruber C. G.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractBones found by chance can be of great criminal or historical interest. The nature of their appraisal depends on the individual case, the locally effective legislation and the available resources. To assess whether a find is relevant with respect to criminal investigation, the circumstances of the find and the results of the forensic examination carried out by trained personnel must be considered. The aim of this study was to obtain an overview of the circumstances and nature of the finds as well as the results of the subsequent expert opinions by evaluating bone finds from the federal state of Hesse, Germany. For this purpose, over a 10-year period from 2011 to 2020, all bone finds examined at the Institutes of Legal Medicine in Gießen and Frankfurt am Main, Germany, were evaluated retrospectively with regard to the locations and circumstances of the finds, their nature (human or non-human), the postmortem interval, possible traces of violent impact and the results of further examinations. Of the 288 bone finds evaluated, 38.2% were found in forests, meadows and parks. In 50.7%, the finds contained human bones, of which 37.0% had a forensically relevant postmortem interval of 50 years or less. Evidence of trauma was described in 77.4% of the human bone cases: postmortem damage in 78.8%, peri-mortem injury in 9.7% and ante-mortem injury in 11.5%. DNA examinations were performed in 40.4% of the human bone finds. They yielded STR profiles in 81.3%, leading to a definite identification in 35.4%. Among the non-human bones sent in, the most common were bones from pigs (23.4%), deer (18.1%), cattle (16.4%), roe deer (11.7%) and sheep (11.7%). The macroscopic examination is the first step of the forensic-osteological evaluation and sets the course for further examinations or investigations. DNA examinations are of great importance for the reliable identification of human bones. They were responsible for 70.8% of successful identifications.

Funder

Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference53 articles.

1. Hessisches Statistisches Landesamt. Statistische Berichte: Die Bevölkerung der Hessischen Gemeinden am 30. Juni 2022. 2022.

2. Ubelaker DH. Human skeletal remains: excavation, analysis, interpretation. 2nd ed. Washington: Taraxacum; 1989.

3. Verhoff MA, Kreutz K, Ramsthaler F, Schiwy-Bochat K-H. Forensische Anthropologie und Osteologie - Übersicht und Definitionen. Dtsch Ärztebl. 2006;103:782–8.

4. Garvin HM, Dunn R, Sholts SB, Litten MS, Mohamed M, Kuttickat N, et al. Forensic tools for species identification of skeletal remains: metrics, statistics, and OsteoID. Biology. 2021;11:25.

5. Bonicelli A, Mickleburgh HL, Chighine A, Locci E, Wescott DJ, Procopio N. The “ForensOMICS” approach for postmortem interval estimation from human bone by integrating metabolomics, lipidomics, and proteomics. eLife. 2022;11:e83658.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3