Health information systems data for decision-making: case study in three cities on current practices and opportunities

Author:

Rajkumar Sarah,Secula Florence,Cobos Daniel,Socha Anna,Boch Johannes,des Rosiers Sarah,Reiker Theresa,Barboza Joseph,Seck Karim,Silveira Mariana,Nguyen Thuy,Steinmann Peter

Abstract

AbstractA functional and reliable Health Information System (HIS) is vital for data-based decision-making in public health. Here we describe the assessment of data processes and general HIS principles by adapting a global approach to three cities. The assessments supported the data strategy of the CARDIO4cities initiative in each city aiming to improve urban population health by increasing the use of cardiovascular disease (CVD) data to inform decision-making. We aimed to explore data collection processes and entities, data availability and quality as well as data ownership and sharing regarding a set of identified key performance indicators (KPIs). KPIs were based on a global theory of change (ToC) and a global evaluation and indicator framework and were tailored to each location. By first assessing existing sources and processes regarding data, recommendations for changes and improvements are sure to build on current circumstances. To map the data, existing data collection, analysis and storage processes were investigated. A flow chart was created to visualize the data pathways and challenges for each system and findings were compared across cities to document differences and similarities. Data quality and interoperability of various separate systems were the most prominent challenges for all HISs. The observed dvata quality issues originated from incorrect, missing and incomplete data and were connected to the misunderstanding of indicators, incomplete data input forms or the lack of a systematic data routine in the workflow. Harmonization of the HISs to ensure interoperability can facilitate data collection and analysis of health data and can provide a solid basis for health management decision-making. Based on the presented HIS cases, we recommend to examine, map and verify current processes when conducting a HIS assessment, to visualize findings and to gauge the interest of government entities to ensure political support.

Funder

Novartis Foundation

University of Basel

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference28 articles.

1. WHO. Monitoring the building blocks of health systems: a handbook of indicators and their measurement strategies. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

2. WHO. Global diffusion of eHealth: making universal health coverage achievable. Report of the third global survey on eHealth. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.

3. WHO. Reinforcing health information systems. World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.

4. Schmidt BM, Colvin CJ, Hohlfeld A, Leon N. Definitions, components and processes of data harmonisation in healthcare: a scoping review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020;20:222. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01218-7.

5. Mumbere O, Kopi L. How to conduct a data quality assessment (DQA): an aid memoir for a COR/AOR. USAID; 2012.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3