Abstract
Abstract
Background
Dementia has been the leading cause of death in the UK since 2015. Increasing evidence supports an association between socioeconomic position (SEP) and dementia onset in later life. However, limited studies have examined how life-course SEP influences the development of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), an intermediate state potentially preceding dementia. Therefore, the present study aims to examine the relationship between life-course SEP and MCI amongst adults aged 50 years in Great Britain.
Methods
We employed data from the National Child Development Study (NCDS), also known as the 1958 British Birth Cohort, to determine the associations between SEP and MCI in 6590 participants. We categorised life-course measures of SEP as stable high/low or moving upward/downward over the life course. We assessed MCI at age 50 using one standard deviation below the averaged combined scores from all cognitive tests available. We then used binary logistic regression to estimate the longitudinal associations between life-course SEP and MCI.
Results
Relative to those of a high SEP across the life course, participants who moved upward, downward, or remained at a low SEP were significantly associated with 25% (95% CI 1.02–1.54, p = 0.035), 70% (95% CI 1.27–2.27, p < 0.001), and 85% (95% CI 1.50–2.29, p < 0.001), respectively, higher odds of MCI, independent of all selected covariates.
Conclusions
Lower life-course SEP was associated with significantly higher odds of MCI onset in middle life within the NCDS cohort. Public health policies targeting cognitive impairment should encompass a life-course approach to reduce socioeconomic inequalities.
Funder
National Institute on Aging
Economic and Social Research Council
National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit
UK Health Security Agency
Alzheimer's Society UK
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Wittenberg R, Hu B, Barraza-Araiza L, Rehill A. Projections of older people with dementia and costs of dementia care in the United Kingdom, 2019–2040. London: London School of Economics and Political Sciences; 2019 [online]. https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/sites/default/files/201911/cpec_report_november_2019.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2021.
2. Murayama H, Sugiyama M, Inagaki H, Ura C, Miyamae F, Edahiro A, Motokawa K, Okamura T, Awata S. The differential effects of age on the association between childhood socioeconomic disadvantage and subjective symptoms of dementia among older Japanese people. J Epidemiol. 2019;29:241–6.
3. Deckers K, Cadar D, van Boxtel MP, Verhey FR, Steptoe A, Köhler S. Modifiable risk factors explain socioeconomic inequalities in dementia risk: evidence from a population-based prospective cohort study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;71(2):549–57.
4. Cadar D, Lassale C, Davies H, Llewellyn DJ, Batty GD, Steptoe A. Individual and area-based socioeconomic factors associated with dementia incidence in England: evidence from a 12-year follow-up in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(7):723–32.
5. Al Hazzouri AZ, Haan MN, Kalbfleisch JD, Galea S, Lisabeth LD, Aiello AE. Life-course socioeconomic position and incidence of dementia and cognitive impairment without dementia in older Mexican Americans: results from the Sacramento area Latino study on aging. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(10):1148–58.