Author:
Stephenson Michele M.,Coleman Margaret E.,Azzolina Nicholas A.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Robust solutions to global, national, and regional burdens of communicable and non-communicable diseases, particularly related to diet, demand interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary collaborations to effectively inform risk analysis and policy decisions.
Objective
U.S. outbreak data for 2005–2020 from all transmission sources were analyzed for trends in the burden of infectious disease and foodborne outbreaks.
Methods
Outbreak data from 58 Microsoft Access® data tables were structured using systematic queries and pivot tables for analysis by transmission source, pathogen, and date. Trends were examined using graphical representations, smoothing splines, Spearman’s rho rank correlations, and non-parametric testing for trend. Hazard Identification was conducted based on the number and severity of illnesses.
Results
The evidence does not support increasing trends in the burden of infectious foodborne disease, though strongly increasing trends were observed for other transmission sources. Morbidity and mortality were dominated by person-to-person transmission; foodborne and other transmission sources accounted for small portions of the disease burden. Foods representing the greatest hazards associated with the four major foodborne bacterial diseases were identified. Fatal foodborne disease was dominated by fruits, vegetables, peanut butter, and pasteurized dairy.
Conclusion
The available evidence conflicts with assumptions of zero risk for pasteurized milk and increasing trends in the burden of illness for raw milk. For future evidence-based risk management, transdisciplinary risk analysis methodologies are essential to balance both communicable and non-communicable diseases and both food safety and food security, considering scientific, sustainable, economic, cultural, social, and political factors to support health and wellness for humans and ecosystems.
Funder
Foundation for Agricultural Integrity and Churchtown Dairy
Raw Milk Institute
Weston A. Price Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference111 articles.
1. World Health Organization (WHO) Global Health estimates 2020: disease burden by cause, age, sex, by country and by region, 2000–2019. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates/global-health-estimates-leading-causes-of-dalys. Accessed 17 Mar 2023.
2. Zhang Y, Simpson RB, Sallade LE, Sanchez E, Monahan KM, Naumova EN. Evaluating completeness of foodborne outbreak reporting in the United States, 1998–2019. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:2898.
3. Cox LA. Shapes and definitions of exposure-response curves: a comment on “A matrix for bridging the epidemiology and risk assessment gap.” Glob Epidemiol. 2019;1: 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloepi.2019.100006.
4. Mokhtari A, Pang H, Santillana Farakos S, McKenna C, Crowley C, Cranford V, Bowen A, Phillips S, Madad A, Obenhuber D, et al. Leveraging risk assessment for foodborne outbreak investigations: the quantitative risk assessment-epidemic curve prediction model. Risk Anal. 2023;43:324–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13896.
5. Bronzwaer S, Catchpole M, de Coen W, Dingwall Z, Fabbri K, Foltz C, Ganzleben C, van Gorcom R, Humphreys A, Jokelainen P, et al. One health collaboration with and among EU agencies—bridging research and policy. One Health. 2022;15: 100464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2022.100464.