Abstract
Abstract
Background
Following the mpox 2022 outbreak, several high-income countries have developed plans with inclusion criteria for vaccination against the mpox disease. This study was carried out to map the factors influencing mpox vaccination uptake to help address the challenges and increase vaccination confidence.
Methods
This was a study based on Tweet analysis. The VADER, Text Blob, and Flair analyzers were adopted for sentiment analysis. The “Levesque conceptual framework for healthcare access” was adopted to evaluate the factors impacting access and the decision to get mpox vaccination. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) criteria were adopted.
Findings
A total of 149,133 tweets were extracted between 01/05/2022 and 23/09/2022. Around 1% of the random tweets were used for qualitative analysis. Of the 149,113, tweets were classified as positive, negative and neutral, respectively, by (a) VADER: (55,040) 37.05%, (44,395) 29.89%, and (49,106) 33.06%, (b) TextBlob: (70,900) 47.73%, (22,729) 15.30%, and (54,921) 36.97%, and (c) Flair: (31,389) 21.13%, (117,152) 78.87%, and 0.00%. Sentiment trajectories revealed that communication, stigmatization, accessibility to and availability of vaccines, and concerns about vaccine safety as factors influencing decision-making in the content and flow of tweets.
Interpretation
Twitter is a key surveillance tool for understanding factors influencing decisions and access to mpox vaccination. To address vaccine mistrust and disinformation, a social media-based risk communication plan must be devised. Adopting measures to remove logistical vaccination hurdles is needed. Obtaining fact-based information from credible sources is key to improving public confidence.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Nandi A, Shet A. Why vaccines matter: understanding the broader health, economic, and child development benefits of routine vaccination. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020;16:1900–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1708669.
2. World Health Organisation. Mpox (monkeypox). 2022. https://www.who.int/health-topics/monkeypox/#tab=tab_1. Accessed Oct 17 2022.
3. Dsouza VS, Rajkhowa P, Mallya BR, Raksha DS, Mrinalini V, Cauvery K, et al. A sentiment and content analysis of tweets on monkeypox stigma among the LGBTQ+ community: a cue to risk communication plan. Dialogues Health. 2023;2:100095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dialog.2022.100095.
4. Gonzales M. Monkeypox and LGBTQ workers: how to avoid stigmatizing gay and bisexual employees. 2022. https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/behavioral-competencies/global-and-cultural-effectiveness/pages/monkeypox-and-lgbtq-workers-how-to-avoid-stigmatizing-gay-and-bisexual-employees.aspx. Accessed Mar 24 2023.
5. Thornhill JP, Barkati S, Walmsley S, Rockstroh J, Antinori A, Harrison LB, et al. Monkeypox virus infection in humans across 16 countries—april–june 2022. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:679–91. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2207323.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献