Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The Biopsychosocial model (BPS) represents a comprehensive paradigm of consolidated practices. Although it has been outlined as the gold standard in sexology, its implementation is often challenging. The sex-positive approach is a ground-breaking movement that is gaining popularity all over and is focused on the recognition of different sexual expressions as valid, consensual, healthy, and meaningful. However, a pragmatic implementation of this approach is still missing.
Methods
A critical review was conducted based on bibliographic research on Medline, PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science on relevant articles published from January 2011 to July 2021.
Results
A total of 116 papers were included in the following review, indicating an increasing body of research about BPS and sex-positive frameworks during the last 10 years. One of the main limitations in the BPS is the scarce attention paid to socio-cultural factors involved in sexual expressions, such as the role of negative attitudes towards sexuality that may affect health care professionals’ work. An application of the sex-positive approach to the BPS model may bring greater attention to the needs, values and desires of the individual, as well as allow a new knowledge and understanding of sexuality within a broader spectrum, including diversities and pleasures.
Conclusions
The sex-positive approach represents a viable path that entails the willingness of health care professionals to get involved actively; criticize their personal attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge about sex and work hard to improve their practice in sexology.
Policy Implications
A discussion of the possible fruitful integration between the BPS and the sex-positive approach is presented, highlighting practical applications in research, clinical practice, training and sex education and giving possible directions for future studies and policies.
Funder
Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Health (social science),Gender Studies
Reference117 articles.
1. American Counseling Association. (2005). ACA code of ethics. Alexandria, VA: Author.
2. Ali, S., Keo, B. S., & Chaudhuri, S. (2020). Critically understanding South Asian sexual health: A call for a holistic and sex positive approach. International Journal of Sexual Health, 1–11.
3. Althof, S. E. (2007). It was the best of times; it was the worst of times. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 33(5), 399–403.
4. Althof, S. E., & Needle, R. B. (2011). Psychological factors associated with male sexual dysfunction: Screening and treatment for the urologist. Urologic Clinics of North America, 38(2), 141–146.
5. AMA - American Medical Association. . (1996). AMA code of medical ethics. Author.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献