Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
This article explores explanations for attitudes towards the acceptability of transactional sex. The sparse research investigating attitudes towards transactional sex uncovers a link between gender equality, or feminism, and a lack of support for the trade in sex. However, there are no research agendas that attempt to explain variance in attitudes towards transactional sex where support for gender equality is widespread throughout a population.
Methods
We estimate regression models utilizing the 2017 Danish Values Survey (Den Danske Værdiundersøgelse) in order to predict views on the acceptability of transactional sex.
Results
While the trade in sex is legal in Denmark, we find that a majority of respondents hold negative attitudes towards transactional sex, which conveys a lack of congruence between public opinion and policy. Further, gender is a powerful predictor of attitudes towards transactional sex, with women finding it less acceptable. In addition, the analysis uncovers that general attitudes towards sexual behaviour are the largest predictor of views on the acceptability of transactional sex. That being said, we find that men’s views on the acceptability of transactional sex are more of a function of their general attitudes towards sexual behaviour than they are for women.
Conclusions
The findings indicate that, unlike men, women appear to differentiate between their attitudes towards general sexual behaviour and their views on sexual behaviour that they may associate with negative societal implications.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Health (social science),Gender Studies
Reference72 articles.
1. Abel, G. M. (2014). A decade of decriminalization: Sex work ‘down under’ but not underground. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 14(5), 580–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895814523024.
2. Abrams, J. K., & Della Fave, L. R. (1976). Authoritarianism, religiosity, and the legalization of victimless crimes. Sociology & Social Research, 61, 69–82.
3. Albright, E., & D’Adamo, K. (2017). Decreasing human trafficking through sex work decriminalization. AMA Journal Of Ethics, 19(1), 122–126. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.1.sect2-1701.
4. Altemimei, D. (2013). Prostitution and the right to privacy: A comparative analysis of current law in the United States and Canada. University of Illinois Law Review, 2013(2), 625–659.
5. Amnesty International. (2016). Sex workers at risk: A research summary on human rights abuses against sex workers. London: Amnesty International Ltd.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献