Abstract
AbstractTarlov cysts were thought to be anatomic variants of uncertain etiology and clinical significance when initially described over 80 years ago. They are often detected in routine lumbosacral imaging and generally not reported in a differential diagnosis. There is increasing evidence that at least some Tarlov cysts are symptomatic and can have a significant adverse impact on patients’ health and well-being. Women are disproportionately affected with this condition, often presenting with long-standing pain and neurological dysfunctions. Significant gender bias has been a concern in the management of these patients. Unfortunately, there is no consensus on patient selection or management approaches for symptomatic Tarlov cysts. This review article updates information on the prevalence, diagnosis, clinical significance, and treatments of these cysts. Based on these findings and experience with over 1000 patient referrals, a treatment decision algorithm for symptomatic Tarlov cysts was constructed to provide guidance for appropriate management of patients with these complex cysts.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical),Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Reference123 articles.
1. Konar SK, Bir SC, Maiti TK, Bollam P, Nanda A (2016) Isadore Max Tarlov (1905–1977) and the controversial Tarlov cyst: historical perspective. J Neurosurg Spine 24(3):510–513
2. Tarlov IM (1948) Cysts, perineurial, of the sacral roots; another cause, removable, of sciatic pain. J Am Med Assoc 138(10):740–744
3. Goyal RN, Russell NA, Benoit BG, Belanger JM (1987) Intraspinal cysts: a classification and literature review. Spine 12(3):209–213
4. Nabors MW, Pait TG, Byrd EB, Karim NO, Davis DO, Kobrine AI et al (1988) Updated assessment and current classification of spinal meningeal cysts. J Neurosurg 68(3):366–377
5. Paulsen RD, Call GA, Murtagh FR (1994) Prevalence and percutaneous drainage of cysts of the sacral nerve root sheath (Tarlov cysts). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15(2):293–7. discussion8-9