A comparative study of transradial versus transfemoral approach for flow diversion-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A comparative study of transradial versus transfemoral approach for flow diversion

Published:2021-02-09 Issue:8 Volume:63 Page:1335-1343
ISSN:0028-3940
Container-title:Neuroradiology
language:en
Short-container-title:Neuroradiology

Author:

Weinberg Joshua H.,Sweid Ahmad,Hammoud Batoul,Asada Ashlee,Greco-Hiranaka Cannon,Piper Keenan,Gooch Michael Reid,Tjoumakaris Stavropoula,Herial Nabeel,Hasan David,Zarzour Hekmat,Rosenwasser Robert H.,Jabbour Pascal^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00234-021-02672-4.pdf

Reference42 articles.

1. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, Niemela K, Xavier D, Widimsky P, Budaj A, Niemela M, Valentin V, Lewis BS, Avezum A, Steg PG, Rao SV, Gao P, Afzal R, Joyner CD, Chrolavicius S, Mehta SR, group Rt (2011) Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 377(9775):1409–1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60404-2

2. Mitchell MD, Hong JA, Lee BY, Umscheid CA, Bartsch SM, Don CW (2012) Systematic review and cost-benefit analysis of radial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 5(4):454–462. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965269

3. Snelling BM, Sur S, Shah SS, Marlow MM, Cohen MG, Peterson EC (2018) Transradial access: lessons learned from cardiology. J Neurointerv Surg 10(5):487–492. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013295

4. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR (2009) Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 157(1):132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.023

5. Kok MM, Weernink MGM, von Birgelen C, Fens A, van der Heijden LC, van Til JA (2018) Patient preference for radial versus femoral vascular access for elective coronary procedures: The PREVAS study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 91(1):17–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27039

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Early exploration of the economic impact of transradial access (TRA) versus transfemoral access (TFA) for neurovascular procedures in Spain;Journal of Medical Economics;2023-11-08

2. Transradial access with intra-aortic catheter looping for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms;Frontiers in Neurology;2023-04-27

3. Therapeutic efficacy and complications of radial versus femoral access in endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms;The Neuroradiology Journal;2022-12-23

4. Transradial versus transfemoral access for endovascular therapy of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies;Neurosurgical Review;2022-09-21

5. Direct carotid artery puncture for acute ischemic stroke: Local experience and systematic review;Interventional Neuroradiology;2022-09-13