Abstract
AbstractMicrobially-induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP) is a biological process in which microbially-produced urease enzymes convert urea and calcium into solid calcium carbonate (CaCO3) deposits. MICP has been demonstrated to reduce permeability in shale fractures under elevated pressures, raising the possibility of applying this technology to enhance shale reservoir storage safety. For this and other applications to become a reality, non-invasive tools are needed to determine how effectively MICP seals shale fractures at subsurface temperatures. In this study, two different MICP strategies were tested on 2.54 cm diameter and 5.08 cm long shale cores with a single fracture at 60 ℃. Flow-through, pulsed-flow MICP-treatment was repeatedly applied to Marcellus shale fractures with and without sand (“proppant”) until reaching approximately four orders of magnitude reduction in apparent permeability, while a single application of polymer-based “immersion” MICP-treatment was applied to an Eagle Ford shale fracture with proppant. Low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF-NMR) and X-Ray computed microtomography (micro-CT) techniques were used to assess the degree of biomineralization. With the flow-through approach, these tools revealed that while CaCO3 precipitation occurred throughout the fracture, there was preferential precipitation around proppant. Without proppant, the same approach led to premature sealing at the inlet side of the core. In contrast, immersion MICP-treatment sealed off the fracture edges and showed less mineral precipitation overall. This study highlights the use of LF-NMR relaxometry in characterizing fracture sealing and can help guide NMR logging tools in subsurface remediation efforts.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference67 articles.
1. Anjum S (2023) Material properties of ureolytically induced calcium carbonate composites [Doctor of Philosophy, Montana State University].
2. Bachmeier KL, Williams AE, Warmington JR, Bang SS (2002) Urease activity in microbiologically-induced calcite precipitation. J Biotechnol 93(2):171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1656(01)00393-5
3. Barba R, Allison J, Villarreal M (2022) A Comparison of Latest Generation Frac New Well and Refrac Results with Evidence of Refrac Reorientation. 10th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, Texas. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2022-3724057
4. Bedey K, Willett MR, Cunningham AB, Phillips AB, Kirkland CM, Dobeck L, Eldring J, Crandall D, Rutqvist J (2023) Developing Methods to Assess Changes in Mechanical Properties of Shale Modified by Engineered Mineral Precipitation. 57th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, Atlanta, GA. https://doi.org/10.56952/ARMA-2023-0807
5. Blümich B (2005) Essential NMR for scientists and engineers. Springer