Abstract
AbstractIn recent years, a plethora of new metaheuristic algorithms have explored different sources of inspiration within the biological and natural worlds. This nature-inspired approach to algorithm design has been widely criticised. A notable issue is the tendency for authors to use terminology that is derived from the domain of inspiration, rather than the broader domains of metaheuristics and optimisation. This makes it difficult to both comprehend how these algorithms work and understand their relationships to other metaheuristics. This paper attempts to address this issue, at least to some extent, by providing accessible descriptions of the most cited nature-inspired algorithms published in the last 20 years. It also discusses commonalities between these algorithms and more classical nature-inspired metaheuristics such as evolutionary algorithms and particle swarm optimisation, and finishes with a discussion of future directions for the field.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference70 articles.
1. Abbass HA. MBO: marriage in honey bees optimization—a haplometrosis polygynous swarming approach. In: Proceedings of the 2001 congress on evolutionary computation (CEC 2001), vol 1. IEEE; 2001. , p. 207–14.
2. Aranha C, Campelo F. Evolutionary computation bestiary; 2019. https://github.com/fcampelo/EC-Bestiary (online accessed 9 Oct 2019).
3. Atashpaz-Gargari E, Lucas C. Imperialist competitive algorithm: an algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition. In: Proceedings of the 2007 congress on evolutionary computation (CEC 2007). IEEE; 2007. p. 4661–7.
4. Blackwell T, Branke J. Multi-swarm optimization in dynamic environments. In: Workshops on applications of evolutionary computation. Springer; 2004. p. 489–500.
5. Burke EK, Gendreau M, Hyde M, Kendall G, Ochoa G, Özcan E, Rong Q. Hyper-heuristics: a survey of the state of the art. J Oper Res Soc. 2013;64(12):1695–724.
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献