Abstract
AbstractThe creation and maintenance of Registers of Processing Activities (ROPA) are essential to meeting the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and thus to demonstrate compliance based on the GDPR concept of accountability. To establish its effectiveness in meeting this obligation, we evaluate an ROPA semantic model, the Common Semantic Model–ROPA (CSM–ROPA). Semantic models and tools represent one solution to the compliance challenges faced by organisations: the heterogeneity of relevant data sources, and the lack of tool interoperability and agreed common standards. By surveying current practice and the literature we identify the requirements for GDPR accountability tools: digital exchange of data, automated accountability verification and privacy-aware data governance. A case study was conducted to analyse the expressivity and effectiveness of CSM–ROPA when used as an interoperable, machine-readable mediation layer to express the concepts in a comprehensive regulator-provided accountability framework used for GDPR compliance. We demonstrate that CSM–ROPA can express 98% of ROPA accountability terms and fully express nine of the ten European regulators' ROPA templates. We identify three terms for addition to CSM–ROPA, and we identify areas where CSM–ROPA relies on partial matches that indicate model limitations. These improvements to CSM–ROPA will provide comprehensive coverage of the regulator-supplied model. We show that tools based on CSM–ROPA can fully meet the requirements of compliance best practice when compared with either manual accountability approaches or a leading privacy software solution.
Funder
SFI Research Centres Programme
Dublin City University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. CNIL. https://www.cnil.fr/en/record-processing-activities. Accessed 15 Feb 2022.
2. International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP). The value of investing in well-constructed records of processing activities (iapp.org). https://iapp.org/news/a/the-value-of-investing-in-well-constructed-recordings-of-processing-activities/. Accessed 11 Sept 2021.
3. International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP). Trust Arc.: measuring privacy operations. (2019). https://iapp.org/resources/article/measuring-privacy-operations/. Accessed 11 Sept 2021.
4. Ryan P, Pandit HJ, Brennan R. Building a data processing activities catalog: representing heterogeneous compliance-related information for GDPR using DCAT-AP and DPV. In: International Conference on Semantic Systems (SEMANTiCS), Amsterdam, 2021; https://doi.org/10.3233/SSW210043.
5. Castlebridge Register of Processing Activities (2020) https://castlebridge.ie/research/2020/ropa-report/. Accessed 11 Sep 2021.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献