Abstract
AbstractVia analysis of velocity and stress fields from Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes simulations over diverse complex terrains spanning several continents, in neutral conditions we find displaced areal-mean logarithmic wind speed profiles. The corresponding effective roughness length ($$z_\text {0,eff}$$
z
0,eff
), friction velocity ($$u _{*\text {,eff}}$$
u
∗
,eff
), and displacement height ($$d_\text {eff}$$
d
eff
) characterise the drag exerted by the terrain. Simulations and spectral analyses reveal that the terrain statistics—and consequently $$d_\text {eff}$$
d
eff
, $$u _{*\text {,eff}}$$
u
∗
,eff
and $$z_\text {0,eff}$$
z
0,eff
—can change significantly with flow direction, including flow in opposite directions. Previous studies over scaled or simulated fractal surfaces reported $$z_\text {0,eff}$$
z
0,eff
to depend on the standard deviation of terrain elevation ($$\sigma _h$$
σ
h
), but over real terrains we find $$z_\text {0,eff}$$
z
0,eff
varies with standard deviation of terrain slopes ($$\sigma _{\Delta h/\Delta x}$$
σ
Δ
h
/
Δ
x
). Terrain spectra show the dominant scales contributing to $$\sigma _{\Delta h/\Delta x}$$
σ
Δ
h
/
Δ
x
vary from $$\sim $$
∼
1–10 km, with power-law behaviour over smaller scales corresponding to fractal terrain used in earlier works. The dependence of $$z_\text {0,eff}$$
z
0,eff
on $$\sigma _{\Delta h/\Delta x}$$
σ
Δ
h
/
Δ
x
is consistent with fractal terrain having $$\sigma _{\Delta h/\Delta x} \propto \sigma _h$$
σ
Δ
h
/
Δ
x
∝
σ
h
, as well as classic theory for individual hills. We obtain relationships for $$z_\text {0,eff}$$
z
0,eff
, $$d_\text {eff}$$
d
eff
, and $$u _{*\text {,eff}}$$
u
∗
,eff
in terms of $$\sigma _{\Delta h/\Delta x}$$
σ
Δ
h
/
Δ
x
, finding that $$d_\text {eff}$$
d
eff
acts as a characteristic length scale within $$z_\text {0,eff}$$
z
0,eff
. Considering flow in opposite directions, use of upslope statistics did not improve $$z_\text {0,eff}$$
z
0,eff
predictions; sheltering effects likely require more sophisticated treatment. Our findings impact practical applications and research, including micrometeorological flow, computational fluid dynamics, atmospheric model coupling, and mesoscale and climate modelling. We discuss limitations of the $$z_\text {0,eff}$$
z
0,eff
formulations developed herein, and provide recommendations for practical use.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Anderson W, Meneveau C (2011) Dynamic roughness model for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow over multiscale, fractal-like rough surfaces. J Fluid Mech 679:288–314
2. Apsley D, Castro IP (1997) A limited-length-scale $$k$$-$$\epsilon $$ model for the neutral and stably-stratified atmospheric boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 83:75–98
3. Astrup P, Larsen S (1999) WAsP Engineering—flow model for wind over land and sea. Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark, Risø Report R-1107 (EN)
4. Ayotte KW, Xu D, Taylor PA (1994) The impact of turbulence closure schemes on predictions of the mixed spectral finite-difference model for flow over topography. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 68(1–2):1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00712662
5. Badger J, Davis N, Hahmann AN, Olsen BT, Larsén XG, Kelly M, Volker P, Badger M, Ahsbahs TT, Mortensen NG, Ejsing Jørgensen H, Lundtang Petersen E, Lange J, Fichaux N (2015) The new worldwide microscale wind resource assessment data on IRENA’s global atlas. the EUDP Global Wind Atlas. In: EWEA Technology Workshop 2015, European Wind Energy Association (EWEA), Helsinki, Finland
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献