Abstract
AbstractWe use content analysis to show that the diagnosis of the financial crisis of 2007–2009 shifted significantly from a focus on the need for structural change in the banking industry to an emphasis on culture and reform at the organizational level. We consider four overlapping subsystems in which this shift in problem–solution clusters played out—political, regulatory, legal, and consulting—and show that the “structural reform agenda,” which was initially strong and publicly prominent in the political arena, lost attention. Over time it was displaced by a neoliberal managerialist turn, which watered down or abandoned structural solutions and instead played up a new “culture and conduct reform agenda.” We explain this shift in terms of the marketization of regulation, which—following Mautner (Language and the market society, 1st ed. Routledge, 2010)’s model of interdiscursive alignment—we detect in the shifting language of financial-services reform across the four subsystems in scope. We argue that a neoliberal turn took place with a discursive closure that made the structural reform alternative gradually unsayable and, in the end, unthinkable. At the same time, the discourse turned to embrace the neoliberal agenda, built on the myth of self-regulating actors and markets, manifest in the culture problematic. This managerialist turn was able to mobilise, and be operationalised by, an industry of consultants, whereas structural change came to be seen by regulators as too risky to implement. We claim that these dynamics reveal how a form of “collective strategic ignorance,” based on powerful institutional myths, was systematically oriented to ignore and reject structural sources of crisis. Finally, we suggest that the observed pattern of displacement—whereby initial calls for structural change become later displaced by managerial and procedural solutions—is common to other social issues, such as audit reform and corporate social responsibility.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Economics and Econometrics,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference65 articles.
1. Adolphs, S. (2006). Introducing electronic text analysis. Routledge.
2. Arnold, M. (2015). Public outrage is the perfect stick to prod HSBC into break-up. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/85c78c24-c0fb-11e4-876d-00144feab7de. Accessed 17 July 2023
3. Augar, P. (2010). A better way to break up the banks. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2010/02/a-better-way-to-break-up-the-b. Accessed 17 July 2023
4. Bait, S. (2012). Why it's time to break up the 'too big to fail' banks. Fortune. https://fortune.com/2012/01/18/why-its-time-to-break-up-the-too-big-to-fail-banks. Accessed 17 July 2023
5. Blaxill, L. (2017). The language of imperialism in British Electoral Politics, 1880–1910. Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 45(3), 416–448.