“Traduttore, Traditore?” Translating Human Rights into the Corporate Context

Author:

McVey MarisaORCID,Ferguson John,Puyou François-Régis

Abstract

AbstractThis paper critically investigates the implementation of the UN guiding principles on business and human rights (UNGPs) into the corporate setting through the concept of ‘translation’. In the decade since the creation of the UNGPs, little academic research has focussed specifically on the corporate implementation of human rights. Drawing on qualitative case studies of two multinational corporations—an oil and gas company and a bank—this paper unpacks how human rights are translated into the corporate context. In doing so, the paper focuses on the “resonance dilemma” translators encounter, the strategies used to make human rights understandable and palatable, and the difficulties that emerge from this process. We contend that the process of making human rights understandable and manageable can change their form and content, which may act as an obstacle to human rights realisation and corporate accountability for human rights.

Funder

Institute of Chartered Accountants Scotland

Scottish Graduate School of Social Science

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Economics and Econometrics,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management

Reference113 articles.

1. Amnesty International. (2020). Nigeria: 2020 could be Shell’s year of reckoning. Retrieved July 3, 2020, from https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/02/nigeria-2020-could-be-shell-year-of-reckoning/

2. Arnold, D. (2016). Corporations and human rights obligations. Business and Human Rights Journal, 1(2), 1–21.

3. Bağlayan, B., Landau, I., McVey, M., & Wodajo, K. (2018). Good business: The economic case for protecting human rights. Accessed July 24, 2020, from https://corporatejustice.org/2018_good-business-report.pdf

4. Behnam, M., & Maclean, T. L. (2011). Where is the accountability in international accountability standards?: A decoupling. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 45–72.

5. Bernaz, N. (2013). Enhancing corporate accountability for human rights violations: Is extraterritoriality the magic potion? Journal of Business Ethics, 117(3), 493–511.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3