Abstract
AbstractThe Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are an opportunity to address major social and environmental challenges. As a widely agreed framework they offer a potential way to mobilise stakeholders on a global scale. The manner in which the goals, with time-based targets and specific metrics, are set out within a voluntary reporting process adopted by both governments and business, provides a fascinating and important case for organisational studies. It is both about advancing performance measurement and evidence-based policy-making for sustainable development, and also participation and consultation at a wider, more global scale, than has ever been possible before. This paper contributes to the notion of SDGs as a wicked problem, answering calls for deeper theorisation, via synthesis with core ideas in the management field of decision theory. A case study on the wicked problem of deforestation and its links to supply chains, multi-stakeholder initiatives and SDG reporting, provides an illustration of the relevance of the application of decision theory to wicked problems, presented using a novel conceptual framework. This helps to illustrate new avenues for research and practical application regarding the balance of technocratic and participative approaches for sustainable development.
Funder
Economic and Social Research Council
University of Sussex
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Economics and Econometrics,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference83 articles.
1. Abbott, K. W., & Bernstein, S. (2015). The high-level political forum on sustainable development: Orchestration by default and design. Global Policy, 6(3), 222–233.
2. Antunes, C. H., Dias, L., Dantas, G., Mathias, J., & Zamboni, L. (2016). An application of soft systems methodology in the evaluation of policies and incentive actions to promote technological innovations in the electricity sector. Energy Procedia, 106, 258–278.
3. Augustsson, H., Churruca, K., & Braithwaite, J. (2019). Re-energising the way we manage change in healthcare: The case for soft systems methodology and its application to evidence-based practice. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 666.
4. Baba, V. V., & HakemZadeh, F. (2012). Toward a theory of evidence based decision making. Management Decision, 50(5), 832–867.
5. Benkert, J. (2020). Reframing business sustainability decision-making with value-focussed thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 174, 1–16.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献