Author:
Gatrell Caroline,Ladge Jamie J.,Powell Gary N.
Abstract
AbstractThis paper explores how pregnancy discrimination at work is perceived by both employers and pregnant employees. Using a public, qualitative dataset collected by the UK Equality and Human Rights Commission that offers perspectives from both employers and pregnant employees, we explore the unfair and unethical treatment of pregnant employees at work. Our findings show how pregnant workers are expected to conform with workplace systems that are treated as sacred. We suggest that employer valorization of the mythical figure of ‘ideal worker’ disadvantages pregnant workers. We observe how, even if this contravenes maternity protection laws, some employers self-justify discrimination against pregnant employees who they perceive to have transgressed ‘appropriate’ workplace behaviors as ethical and reasonable. To illuminate and conceptualize the notion of transgression, our analysis has led us to the ideas of philosopher Georges Bataille, specifically his reflections on how individuals who ‘transgress’ social norms are treated as taboo, as well as his metaphorical descriptions of people and practices as either sacred or profane. We theorize that pregnant workers who are treated as profane should be reclassified as sacred, opening up this idea for debate so as to disrupt long-standing patterns of discrimination.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Economics and Econometrics,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference83 articles.
1. Acas. (2023) Managing your employees’ maternity leave and pay, https://www.acas.org.uk/managing-your-employees-maternity-leave-and-pay/discrimination-because-of-pregnancy-and-maternity. Accessed 17 June.
2. Acker, J. (2003). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. In R. J. Ely, E. G. Foley, & M. A. Scully (Eds.), Reader in gender, work and organization (pp. 49–61). Blackwell.
3. Andiappan, P., Reavley, M., & Silver, S. (1990). Discrimination against pregnant employees: An analysis of arbitration and human rights tribunal decisions in Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(2), 143–149.
4. Arena, D. F., Jr., Volpone, S. D., & Jones, K. P. (2023). (Overcoming) maternity bias in the workplace: A systematic review. Journal of Management, 49(1), 52–84.
5. Ashman, R., Radcliffe, L., Patterson, A., & Gatrell, C. (2022). Re-ordering motherhood and employment: Mobilizing ‘Mums Everywhere’ during Covid-19. British Journal of Management, 33(3), 1125–1143.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献