Author:
Spinosa Charles,Hancocks Matthew,Tsoukas Haridimos,Glennon Billy
Abstract
AbstractScholars are increasingly examining how formal leaders of organizations change moral norms. The prominent accounts over-emphasize the role of rational persuasion. We focus, instead, on how formal leaders successfully break and thereby create moral norms. We draw on Dreyfus’s ontology of cultural paradigms and Williams’s moral luck to develop our framework for viewing leader-driven radical norm the change. We argue that formal leaders, embedded in their practices’ grounding, clarifying, and organizing norms, get captivated by anomalies and respond to them by taking moral risks, which, if practically successful, create a new normative order. We illustrate the framework with Churchill’s actions in 1940 and Anita Roddick’s Body Shop. Last, we discuss normative orders, when ordinary leaders change norms, evil, and further research.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Economics and Econometrics,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference119 articles.
1. Abdelnour, S., Hasselbladh, H., & Kallinikos, J. (2017). Agency and institutions in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 38(12), 1775–1792.
2. Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2016). Changing Organizational Culture: Cultural change work in progress. Sage.
3. Arendt, H. (1971). Life of the Mind. Harcourt Brace.
4. Athanassoulis, N. (2005). Morality, moral luck and responsibility: fortune’s web. UK Palgrave: Basingstoke.
5. Avolio, B. J., Sivasubramaniam, N., Murry, W. D., Jung, D., & Garger, J. W. (2003). Assessing Shared Leadership: Development and Preliminary Validation of a Team Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership, (pp. 141–172). Sage.