Abstract
AbstractGovernments are widely viewed by academics and practitioners (and society more generally) as the key societal actors who are capable of compelling businesses to practice corporate social responsibility (CSR). Arguably, such government involvement could be seen as a technocratic device for encouraging ethical business behaviour. In this paper, we offer a more politicised interpretation of government engagement with CSR where “CSR” is not a desired form of business conduct but an element of discourse that governments can deploy in structuring their relationships with other social actors. We build our argument through a historical analysis of government CSR discourse in the Russian Federation. Laclau and Mouffe's (Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics,
Verso Books, London, 1985) social theory of hegemony underpins our research. We find that “CSR” in the Russian government’s discourse served to legitimise its power over large businesses. Using this case, we contribute to wider academic debates by providing fresh empirical evidence that allows the development of critical evaluation tools in relation to governments’ engagement with “CSR”. We find that governments are capable of hijacking CSR for their own self-interested gain. We close the paper by reflecting on the merit of exploring the case of the Russian Federation. As a “non-core”, non-western exemplar, it provides a useful “mirror” with which to reflect on the more widely used test-bed of Western industrial democracies when scrutinising CSR. Based on our findings, we invite other scholars to adopt a more critical, politicised stance when researching the role of governments in relation to CSR in other parts of the world.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Economics and Econometrics,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference130 articles.
1. Aaronson, S. L. (2007). A match made in the corporate and public interest: Marrying voluntary CSR initiatives and the WTO (Working Paper IIEPWP(2010)6). Institute for International Economic Policy Working Paper Series, Washington, DC: Elliott School of International Affairs, The George Washington University.
2. Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., Tencati, A., Midttun, A., & Perini, F. (2008). The changing role of governments in Corporate Social Responsibility: Drivers and responses. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(4), 347–363.
3. Albareda, L., Lozano, J. M., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on Corporate Social Responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethic, 74(4), 391–407.
4. Archel, P., Husillos, J., & Spence, C. (2011). The institutionalisation of unaccountability: Loading the dice of Corporate Social Responsibility discourse. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(6), 327–343.
5. Arutjunova, V., & Bagrov, A. (2001). 1.5 bil. for a visit to the President. Kommersant, №12 (2142), January 25, Retrieved November 20, 2015, from http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/135646 (in Russian).
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献