Sensitivity to Sample Size in the Context of the Empirical Law of Large Numbers: Comparing the Effectiveness of Three Approaches to Support Early Secondary School Students

Author:

Sommerhoff DanielORCID,Weixler SimonORCID,Hamedinger Christina

Abstract

AbstractA foundation for gathering and interpreting data is the empirical law of large numbers (eLLN). The eLLN has multiple aspects and can be regarded and used with multiple foci. However, it generally relates relative frequencies and probabilities or samples and the corresponding populations. Unfortunately, research has repeatedly revealed that students have problems with tasks including certain foci on the eLLN, particularly regarding their sensitivity to sample size when comparing smaller and larger samples.We first outline the eLLN with its central aspects and provide an overview of corresponding empirical findings. Subsequently, we use Stanovich’s (2018) framework of human processing in heuristics and biases tasks to (re-)interpret theoretical descriptions and prior empirical results to better understand and describe students’ problems with the eLLN. Subsequently, we present three main approaches to support students derived from prior research: A static-contrast approach, a dynamic approach, and a boundary-example approach.As currently no systematic and comparative evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of these approaches, we conducted a quasi-experimental intervention study (N = 256, 6th grade) which empirically compared three implementations of these approaches to a control group. Results underline significant positive short-term effects of each approach. However, the boundary-example intervention showed the highest pre-post effect, the only significant long-term effect, and also effectively reduced the common equal-ratio bias.Results are promising from a research perspective, as Stanovich’s framework proved very helpful and is a promising foundation for future research, and from an educational perspective, as the boundary-example approach is lightweight and easy to implement in classrooms.

Funder

IPN – Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik an der Universität Kiel

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education,General Mathematics

Reference49 articles.

1. Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001.

2. Arbeitskreis Stochastik der GDM (2003). Empfehlungen zu Zielen und zur Gestaltung des Stochastikunterrichts. Stochastik in der Schule, 23(3), 21–26.

3. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (n. d.). Australian Curriculum. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au. Accessed 20 Nov 2019.

4. Batanero, C., Serrano, L., & Garfield, J. B. (1996). Heuristics and biases in secondary school students’ reasoning about probability. In L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (PME 20) (Vol. 2, pp. 51–59). Valencia: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

5. Mathematics education library;C Batanero,2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3