Reference28 articles.
1. F. R. Leavis, The Great Tradition (New York, 1960), p. 44.
2. George Eliot, The Mill on the Floss, ed. Gordon S. Haight (Boston, 1961), p. xiii. All further references are contained in the text.
3. See John Hagan, ‘A Reinterpretation of The Mill on the Floss’, PMLA, 87: 1 (1972), 53–63. Hagan sums up Maggie’s quandary as an impossible choice among men: ‘Had she gone on to love and marry Philip against her father’s and Tom’s wishes’ or ‘had she run away and married Stephen’ she would, in either case, have betrayed someone’s trust (p. 54). Hagan argues, I should note, that readers are meant to value Maggie’s loyalty to her earliest ties and duties, not Tom per se–in fact Hagan blames Tom for making family loyalty and erotic love mutually exclusive for Maggie. Underlining the concept of ‘division’ between ‘the large-souled woman… and the narrow-souled father and brother’ (p. 62), he could be said to anticipate feminist discussions of ‘difference’ in George Eliot.
4. U. C. Knoepflmacher, George Eliot’s Early Novels: The Limits of Realism (Berkeley, CA, 1968), p. 214.
5. Barbara Hardy, The Novels of George Eliot: A Study in Form (New York, 1959), pp. 47–53.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Inappropriate Sympathies in Gaskell and Eliot;The 'Invisible Hand' and British Fiction, 1818-1860;2011