The influence of sub-technique and skiing velocity on air drag in skating style cross-country skiing

Author:

Elfmark OlaORCID,Docter Heleen,Sandbakk Øyvind,Kocbach Jan

Abstract

AbstractIn cross-country skiing, velocities range from 2 m $${\textrm{s}}^{-1}$$ s - 1 up to more than 20 m $${\textrm{s}}^{-1}$$ s - 1 across undulating terrain, and aerodynamics can, therefore, make a large impact on performance. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of skiing velocity on air drag for skating sub-techniques and downhill postures (tuck). Dynamic and static drag measurements for two athletes were performed in a wind tunnel in relevant velocity ranges for each sub-technique. The drag area decreased with velocity from 2 m $${\textrm{s}}^{-1}$$ s - 1 to around 10–12 m $${\textrm{s}}^{-1}$$ s - 1 , where it plateaued. No difference in air drag was found between the sub-techniques performed in upright postures (G2–G4) and thereby relatively similar frontal areas. In the G5 sub-technique performed without poling action in a lower posture, the reduced air drag was approximately 28% lower than for G2–G4 at similar velocities, and could even be reduced by an additional 21.7% by keeping the arms tucked in front of the body. In the downhill tucked postures, athletes could reduce air drag by 23% by keeping a low tuck, compared to a high tuck with straight legs. The sub-techniques were tested both dynamically and by averaging the static positions throughout the movements. The air drag was on average 6.1% lower for dynamic movements, indicating that dynamical movements like in cross-country skiing should be tested dynamically when evaluating air drag. Finally, the chosen cycle rate had minimal influence on air drag.

Funder

NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Modeling and Simulation,Biomedical Engineering

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Comment on: ‘Wind tunnel evaluation of novel drafting formations for an elite marathon runner’ (2023), by Marro M et al.;Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences;2024-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3