Abstract
AbstractTransdisciplinary Sustainability Science has emerged as a viable answer to current sustainability crises with the aim to strengthen collaborative knowledge production. To expand its transformative potential, we argue that Transdisciplinary Sustainability Science needs to thoroughly engage with questions of unequal power relations and hierarchical scientific constructs. Drawing on the work of the feminist philosopher María Puig de la Bellacasa, we examine a feminist ethos of care which might provide useful guidance for sustainability researchers who are interested in generating critical-emancipatory knowledge. A feminist ethos of care is constituted by three interrelated modes of knowledge production: (1) thinking-with, (2) dissenting-within and (3) thinking-for. These modes of thinking and knowing enrich knowledge co-production in Transdisciplinary Sustainability Science by (i) embracing relational ontologies, (ii) relating to the ‘other than human’, (iii) cultivating caring academic cultures, (iv) taking care of non-academic research partners, (v) engaging with conflict and difference, (vi) interrogating positionalities and power relations through reflexivity, (vii) building upon marginalised knowledges via feminist standpoints and (viii) countering epistemic violence within and beyond academia. With our paper, we aim to make a specific feminist contribution to the field of Transdisciplinary Sustainability Science and emphasise its potentials to advance this field.
Funder
Leuphana Universität Lüneburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Sociology and Political Science,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Health (social science),Global and Planetary Change
Reference197 articles.
1. Adams M, Klinsky S, Chhetri N (2020) Barriers to sustainability in poor marginalized communities in the United States: the criminal justice, the prison-industrial complex and foster care systems. Sustainability 12(1):220. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010220
2. Adelman S (2018) The sustainable development goals, anthropocentrism and neoliberalism. In: French D, Kotzé LJ (eds) Sustainable development goals: law, theory and implementation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham Northampton, pp 15–40
3. Ahmed S (2017) Living a feminist life. Duke University Press, Durham
4. ATD Fourth World (2021) Merging Knowledge. Inclusive processes lead to chance. https://www.atd-fourthworld.org/what-we-do/participation/merging-knowledge/ Accessed 20 Aug 2021
5. Atkinson-Graham M, Kenney M, Ladd K, Murray CM, Simmonds EA-J (2015) Care in context: becoming an STS researcher. Soc Stud Sci 45(5):738–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715600277
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献