Abstract
AbstractManaging our transition to sustainability requires a solid understanding of how conditions of financial crisis affect our natural environment. Yet, there has been little focus on the nature of the relationship between financial crises and environmental sustainability, especially in relation to forests and deforestation. This study addressed this gap by providing novel evidence on the impact of financial crises on deforestation. A panel data approach is used looking at Global Forest Watch deforestation data from > 150 countries in > 100 crises in the twenty-first century. This includes an analysis of crises effects on principle drivers of deforestation; timber and agricultural commodities—palm oil, soybean, coffee, cattle, and cocoa. At a global level, financial crises are associated with a reduction in deforestation rates (− 36 p.p) and deforestation drivers; roundwood (− 6.7 p.p.), cattle (− 2.3 p.p.) and cocoa production (− 8.3 p.p.). Regionally, deforestation rates in Asia, Africa, and Europe decreased by − 83, − 43, and 22 p.p, respectively. Drivers behind these effects may be different, from palm oil (− 1.3 p.p.) and cocoa (− 10.5 p.p.) reductions in Africa, to a combination of timber (− 9.5 p.p) and palm oil in Asia. Moreover, financial crises have a larger effect on deforestation in low-income, than upper middle- and high-income countries (− 51 vs − 39 and − 18 p.p. respectively). Using another main dataset on yearly forest cover—the ESA-Climate Change Initiative—a picture arises showing financial crises leading to small global decreases in forest cover (− 0.1 p.p.) with a small agricultural cover increase (0.1 p.p). Our findings point to financial crises as important moments for global deforestation dynamics. Yet, to consolidate benefits on decreasing deforestation, governments need to enhance their sustainable forest management during crisis periods rather than let it slip down national agendas. Finally, to achieve the SDGs related to forests, better global forest cover datasets are needed, with better forest loss/gain data, disturbance history, and understanding of mosaicked landscape dynamics within a satellite pixel.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Sociology and Political Science,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Health (social science),Global and Planetary Change
Reference106 articles.
1. Ahmed K, Shahbaz M, Qasim A, Long W (2015) The linkages between deforestation, energy and growth for environmental degradation in Pakistan. Ecol Ind 49:95–103
2. Alcamo J, Thompson J, Alexander A et al (2020) Analysing interactions among the sustainable development goals: findings and emerging issues from local and global studies. Sustain Sci 15:1561–1572
3. Antonarakis AS (2020) Environment and poverty during the Coronavirus crisis: a lesson for global collaboration. [WWW Document]. SSRP Forum Pandemic Sustain. URL https://www.sussex.ac.uk/ssrp/resources/forum/alexander-antonarakis?fbclid=IwAR0xTgEbFLxdAote5EGy_fcnMxaeSQGujEY3P0l5mokPj6Z9U1u47IIJE_E. Accessed Nov 2021
4. Antoniades A, Antonarakis AS (2022) Financial crises, environment and transition. In: Antoniades A, Antonarakis A, Kempf I (eds) Financial crises, poverty and environmental sustainability: challenges in the context of the SDGs and Covid-19 recovery, sustainable development goals series. Springer Nature
5. Antoniades A, Griffith-Jones S (2018) Global debt dynamics: the elephant in the room. World Econ 41:3256–3268
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献