Abstract
AbstractEnergy communities (ECs), as forms of social innovation, have the potential to contribute to sustainability transitions in the energy system. Hence, policymakers place great hopes in ECs as drivers of the energy transition and impose 'transformative goals' on EC actors. However, earlier work revealed differentiated motives (e.g., personal gain, hedonism, economic reasons) on the part of these actors, with system transformation not always being the most important goal. Hence, this empirical study aims to provide a more nuanced picture of how individual actors, namely, founders, intermediaries, and influential early members of ECs, set about understanding and constructing their roles in the energy transition. Using the concept of actor roles in transitions and taking a discourse–theoretical approach, we study the case of Austria, where recent legislative changes enabled the formation of renewable ECs. Drawing on extensive desk research, 15 in-depth interviews, and participant observations in four community meetings, we identify four ideal–typical role constructions of EC actors: grassroots, entrepreneurial, local hero, and techno-centric. In fact, these roles vary significantly in their transformative potential, with the grassroots role emphasizing empowerment for a profound social and ecological transition, the techno-centric focusing on technological advancement, while the entrepreneurial role prioritizes economic aspects, and the local hero role centers on a limited, small-scale approach. Our findings challenge the widespread assumption of EC actors taking a 'transformative' role and reveal novel insights into the different roles’ main concerns that need to be considered in the implementation of energy policies.
Funder
Vienna University of Economics and Business
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Sociology and Political Science,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Health (social science),Global and Planetary Change
Reference62 articles.
1. Audet R (2016) Transition as discourse. Int J Sustain Dev 19(4):365–382. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2016.080512
2. Bauwens T, Defourny J (2017) Social capital and mutual versus public benefit: the case of renewable energy cooperatives. Ann Public Coop Economics 88(2):203–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12166
3. Bergen N, Labonté R (2020) “Everything is perfect, and we have no problems”: detecting and limiting social desirability bias in qualitative research. Qual Health Res 30(5):783–792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319889354
4. Biely K, Chappin E, de Vries G et al (2022) Understanding the embeddedness of individuals within the larger system to support the energy transition. Sustain Sci 17(6):2173–2175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01230-y
5. BMK [Federal ministry for climate protection, environment, energy, mobility, innovation, and technology] (2022) Energie in Österreich. Zahlen, Daten, Fakten [Energy in Austria. Numbers, data, facts]. Vienna, Austria. https://www.bmk.gv.at/themen/energie/publikationen/zahlen.html
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献