Abstract
AbstractThis paper starts out from the observation that recent official bioeconomy strategies and policy concepts are markedly more moderate in their promises of economic growth compared to the high-flying expectations of a ‘biotech revolution’ promoted around the turn of the millennium. We argue that this stepwise process of moderation is partly due to a series of ‘reality checks’ to which various strands of research on the bioeconomy have (willingly or unwillingly) subjected these promises, forcing governments to move away from visions exposed as unrealistic and to adopt more humble ones. We identify four such ‘reality checks’, originating from research on (a) bioeconomy discourses and knowledges, (b) contestation and power dynamics among actors and competing interests in bioeconomy politics and policymaking, as well as on (c) the economic and (d) biophysical dimensions of existing bio-based economies. In conclusion, we argue that bioeconomy research should adopt a broader perspective that considers transitions toward bio-based processes and resources as but one element in a comprehensive social–ecological transformation of current modes of production and living, and that understanding the dynamics of societal conflict around that transformation is crucial for assessing the social possibility of bioeconomy visions.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Sociology and Political Science,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Health (social science),Global and Planetary Change
Reference99 articles.
1. Allaire G, Wolf SA (2004) Cognitive representations and institutional hybridity in agrofood innovation. Sci Technol Human Values 29:431–458
2. Altieri MA, Nicholls CI (2020) Agroecology and the reconstruction of a post-COVID-19 agriculture. J Peasant Stud 47:881–898
3. Backhouse M, Lorenzen K, Lühmann M, Puder J, Rodríguez F, Tittor A (2017) Bioökonomie-Strategien im Vergleich. Gemeinsamkeiten, Widersprüche und Leerstellen, Working Paper Nr. 1 der BMBF-Nachwuchsgruppe ‘Bioeconomy&Inequalities’. Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena
4. Bauer F (2018) Narratives of biorefinery innovation for the bioeconomy: conflict, consensus or confusion? Environ Innov Soc Trans 28:96–107
5. Befort N (2020) Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: the contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 153:119923
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献