Abstract
AbstractHow can peace be climate resilient? How can peace and environmental sustainability be advanced simultaneously? To address these questions, I develop a new conceptual and theoretical framework for climate resilient peace through degrowth. This paper calls for stronger consideration of positive conceptualizations of peace and of intersectionality and degrowth in pursuit of peace and resilience. Not only does climate change make planetary limitations more salient, but it also highlights rising inequalities. In light of this, peace necessitates transforming societal power structures that are both driving climate change and influencing people’s experiences of climate impacts. Addressing imbalanced power structures then is key to understanding and fostering climate resilient peace. This paper conceptualizes climate resilient peace based on an intersectional understanding of positive peace, highlighting that peace depends on the negation of structural violence experienced at the intersection of political and social identities. In relation to this, I argue that a process of climate resilient peace must address underlying power structures influencing people’s experience of climate harms, and driving climate change so as to mitigate further damage. This paper demonstrates such a process through degrowth, wherein growth is no longer the central economic goal, exemplifying social and ecological means for disrupting structural violence within climate limitations. I discuss and give examples of three key degrowth processes—redistribution, reprioritized care economies, and global equity—as opportunities to foster peace in a changing climate. This framework, thus, contributes a new approach to climate resilient peace that addresses challenges of both social and environmental sustainability.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Sociology and Political Science,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Health (social science),Global and Planetary Change
Reference86 articles.
1. Adger WN, Pulhin JM, Barnett J, et al (2014) Human security. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, et al. (eds) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 755–791
2. Aggestam K, Cristiano F, Strömbom L (2015) Towards agonistic peacebuilding? Exploring the antagonism–agonism nexus in the Middle East Peace process. Third World Quart 36:1736–1753. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1044961
3. Alexander R (2018) Gender, Structural Violence, and Peace. In: Gentry CE, Shepherd LJ, Sjoberg L (eds) The routledge handbook of gender and security, 1st edn. Routledge, London, pp 27–36
4. Alexander S (2015) Basic and maximum income. In: D’Alisa G, Demaria F, Kallis G (eds) Degrowth: a vocabulary for a new era. Routledge, Oxon and New York, pp 146–148
5. Anglin MK (1998) Feminist perspectives on structural violence. Identities 5:145–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1998.9962613
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献