Loss and Damage and limits to adaptation: recent IPCC insights and implications for climate science and policy

Author:

Mechler R.,Singh C.,Ebi K.,Djalante R.,Thomas A.,James R.,Tschakert P.,Wewerinke-Singh M.,Schinko T.,Ley D.,Nalau J.,Bouwer L. M.,Huggel C.,Huq S.,Linnerooth-Bayer J.,Surminski S.,Pinho P.,Jones R.,Boyd E.,Revi A.

Abstract

AbstractRecent evidence shows that climate change is leading to irreversible and existential impacts on vulnerable communities and countries across the globe. Among other effects, this has given rise to public debate and engagement around notions of climate crisis and emergency. The Loss and Damage (L&D) policy debate has emphasized these aspects over the last three decades. Yet, despite institutionalization through an article on L&D by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in the Paris Agreement, the debate has remained vague, particularly with reference to its remit and relationship to adaptation policy and practice. Research has recently made important strides forward in terms of developing a science perspective on L&D. This article reviews insights derived from recent publications by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and others, and presents the implications for science and policy. Emerging evidence on hard and soft adaptation limits in certain systems, sectors and regions holds the potential to further build momentum for climate policy to live up to the Paris ambition of stringent emission reductions and to increase efforts to support the most vulnerable. L&D policy may want to consider actions to extend soft adaptation limits and spur transformational, that is, non-standard risk management and adaptation, so that limits are not breached. Financial, technical, and legal support would be appropriate for instances where hard limits are transgressed. Research is well positioned to further develop robust evidence on critical and relevant risks at scale in the most vulnerable countries and communities, as well as options to reduce barriers and limits to adaptation.

Funder

Austrian Climate Research Programme

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Sociology and Political Science,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Health(social science),Global and Planetary Change

Reference32 articles.

1. Abram N, Gattuso JP, Prakash A, Cheng L, Chidichimo MP, Crate S, Enomoto H,  Garschagen M, Gruber N, Harper S, Holland E,  Kudela RM, Rice J, Steffen K, von Schuckmann K (2019) Framing and context of the report. In: Pörtner HO, Roberts DC,  Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Tignor M, Poloczanska E, Mintenbeck K, Alegría A,  Nicolai M, Okem A, Petzold J, Rama B, Weyer NM (eds) IPCC special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate (in press)

2. Barnett J, Tschakert P, Head L, Adger WN (2016) A science of loss. Nat Clim Change 6(11):976

3. Boyd E, James RA, Jones RG, Young HR, Otto FEL (2017) A typology of loss and damage perspectives. Nat Clim Change 7:723–729

4. Calliari E, Surminski S, Mysiak J (2019) The Politics of (and behind) the UNFCCC’s Loss and Damage mechanism. In: Mechler R, Bouwer L, Schinko T, Surminski S, Linnerooth-Bayer J (eds) Loss and Damage from climate change concepts, methods and policy options. Springer, Cham, pp 155–178

5. Climate Analytics (2019) Loss and Damage at COP25—a hard fought step in the right direction. Climate Analytics. https://climateanalytics.org/blog/2019/loss-and-damage-at-cop25-a-hard-fought-step-in-the-right-direction/. Accessed 25 Jan 2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3