Abstract
AbstractShared socio-economic pathways (SSPs) are alternative global development scenarios focused on the mitigation of and adaptation to climate change. However, global SSPs would need revised versions for regional or local assessment, which is the so-called extended version, because global narratives may lack region-specific important drivers, national policy perspectives, and unification of data for each nation. Thus, it is necessary to construct scenarios that can be used for governments in response to the SSPs to reflect national and sub-national unique situations. This study presents national SSP scenarios, specifically focusing on Japan (hereafter, Japan SSPs), as well as a process for developing scenarios that qualitatively links to global SSPs. We document the descriptions of drivers and basic narratives of Japan SSPs coherent with global SSPs, based on workshops conducted by local researchers and governments. Moreover, we provide a common data set of population and GDP using the national scale. Japan SSPs emphasized population trends different from global SSPs and influencing factors, citizen participation, industrial development resulting from economic change, distribution, and inequality of sub-national population, among others. We selected data sets from existing population projections that have been widely used by Japanese researchers; the data show that the population and GDP of Japan SSPs are expected to be about 20–25% less than global SSPs by 2100.
Funder
Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Sociology and Political Science,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Health (social science),Global and Planetary Change
Reference39 articles.
1. Absar SM, Preston BL (2015) Extending the shared socioeconomic pathways for sub-national impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability studies. Glob Environ Change 33:83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.004
2. Alfieri L, Feyen L, Dottori F, Bianchi A (2015) Ensemble flood risk assessment in Europe under high end climate scenarios. Glob Environ Change 35:199–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.004
3. Calvin K, Bond-Lamberty B, Clarke L, Edmonds J, Eom J, Hartin C, Kim S, Kyle P, Moss R, McJeon H, Patel P, Smith S, Waldhoff S, Wise M (2017) SSP4: a world of inequality. Glob Environ Change 42:284–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.010
4. Carey C (2014) The CCAFS regional scenarios programme: external evaluation report on progress towards programme outcomes. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), Copenhagen, Denmark
5. Carlsen H, Eriksson EA, Dreborg KH, Johansson B, Bodin Ö (2016) Systematic exploration of scenario spaces. Foresight 18(1):59–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-02-2015-0011
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献