Abstract
AbstractAgricultural expansion and intensification are threatening biodiversity worldwide, and future expansion of agricultural land will exacerbate this trend. One of the main drivers of this expansion is an increasingly global trade of agricultural produce. National and international assessments tracking the impact of agriculture on biodiversity thus need to be expanded by a consumption-based accounting of biodiversity loss. In this study, we use global trade data, provided by the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), to construct national trade profiles for 223 countries, at the level of 191 produced items and over the timespan of 15 years. We show how bilateral trade data and a national biodiversity indicator, the Species Habitat Index (SHI), can be combined to quantify consumption-based impacts of agricultural trade on biodiversity. We found that the cropland area for agricultural trade has increased from 17 (in 2000) to 23.5% (in 2013) of the global total cropland area. Especially, countries in Western Europe, North America, and the Middle East, create a large part of their biodiversity footprint outside their own country borders, because they import large amounts of agricultural products from areas where the SHI records high biodiversity loss. With our approach, we can thus identify countries where consumption-based interventions might be most effective for the protection of global biodiversity. Analyses like the one presented in this study are needed to complement territorial sustainability assessments. By taking into account trade and consumption, they can inform cross-border agreements on biodiversity protection.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung
Senckenberg Biodiversität und Klima Forschungszentrum (BiK-F)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Sociology and Political Science,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Health (social science),Global and Planetary Change
Reference67 articles.
1. Alexander P, Brown C, Arneth A et al (2017) Losses, inefficiencies and waste in the global food system. Agric Syst 153:190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.014
2. Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J (2012) World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. In: AgEcon Search. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/288998. Accessed 5 Mar 2021
3. Anseeuw W, Baldinelli GM (2020) Uneven ground: land inequality at the heart of unequal societies. International Land Coalition, Rome
4. Beckmann M, Gerstner K, Akin-Fajiye M, et al (2019) Conventional land-use intensification reduces species richness and increases production: A global meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol 25:1941–1956. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14606
5. Ben-Israel A, Greville TNE (2003) Generalized inverses: theory and applications, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献