Abstract
AbstractDespite the rapid expansion of sustainability science in recent decades, sustainability crises have continued to grow. Sustainability researchers argue that this is partly the result of neglecting people’s inner worlds and call for a stronger consideration of inner states and processes in sustainability scholarship. We argue that the advancement of personal sustainability science, i.e., the systematic inquiry of inner worlds in relation to sustainability, is currently impeded by at least two unresolved issues. First, attitudes, emotions, values, and the like have frequently been the object of sustainability-related research. It thus remains unclear to what exactly researchers should more closely look at when inquiring into people’s inner worlds. Second, the epistemological and methodological foundations for conducting research on inner worlds remain underdeveloped. We illustrate that current research activities usually remain at a phenomenologically shallow level. In response to these issues, we provide conceptual, methodological, and normative cornerstones for a first-person inquiry within personal sustainability science, allowing for an in-depth understanding and potentially even a transformation of people’s inner worlds with regard to sustainability. Overall, we suggest redirecting personal sustainability science more strongly toward the inquiry into people’s subjective (i.e., first-person) experiences of inner states and processes unfolding in relation to sustainability.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference192 articles.
1. Abrahamse W, Steg L, Vlek C, Rothengatter T (2005) A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J Environ Psychol 25(3):273–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002
2. Akenji L (2014) Consumer scapegoatism and limits to green consumerism. J Clean Prod 63:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.022
3. Alfredsson E, Bengtsson M, Brown HS, Isenhour C, Lorek S, Stevis D, Vergragt P (2018) Why achieving the Paris agreement requires reduced overall consumption and production. Sustain Sci Practice Policy 14:1–5
4. Alvaredo F, Chancel L, Piketty T, Saez E, Zucman G (2018) World inequality report 2018. https://wir2018.wid.world/files/download/wir2018-full-report-english.pdf. Accessed 5 August 2022
5. American Psychological Association (n.d.) Mental. In: APA dictionary of psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/sense. Retrieved 28 July 2022
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献