Author:
Gebler Malte,Juraschek Max,Thiede Sebastian,Cerdas Felipe,Herrmann Christoph
Abstract
AbstractSocio-technical systems represent complex interactions of humans with ecological, social and economic systems. A system’s design and its operations determine whether its impact is “negative”, “neutral/zero” or “positive” over the system life cycle with regard to its contribution to sustainable development. But coping with exceeded planetary boundaries and social challenges requires more than “net-zero” approaches to achieve biosphere resilience and healthy societies. While negative and zero impacts are widely studied, the term “positive impact” has just recently gained importance to describe the outcome of design, planning, operational, organizational or engineering processes. Various case studies, reviews and conceptual proposals exist—mostly applied in a specific context—but a clear definition is not yet detectable. Based on a review of existing literature, this paper: (i) analyzes current perceptions of negative, zero and positive impacts of socio-technical systems on absolute sustainability, (ii) summarizes the current state of knowledge on positive impact concepts for sustainable development, (iii) identifies relevant socio-technical system design principles for positive impacts on biosphere, society and economy, (iv) derives management functions and organizational prerequisites within socio-technical systems to enable positive impacts, (v) proposes a guiding framework and a definition for “positive impact of socio-technical systems for absolute sustainability”, and (vi) discusses briefly potential applications and further research demand. This review intends to synthesize existing knowledge from an industrial and engineering design perspective, and delivers an overview on the subject from a global sustainability level to the operational level. The derived insights provide a basis for method development, system design processes and new business models.
Funder
Technische Universität Braunschweig
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Sociology and Political Science,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Health (social science),Global and Planetary Change
Reference104 articles.
1. ACCA (2014) Net positive natural capital ambitions. The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, London, Großbrittanien. https://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-technical/sustainability-reporting/tech-tp-npnca.pdf, checked on 5/28/2020. Accessed 13 June 2022
2. Adams R, Jeanrenaud S, Bessant J, Denyer D, Overy P (2016) Sustainability-oriented innovation. A systematic review. Int J Manag Rev 18(2):180–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12068
3. Aiama D, Edwards S, Bos G, Ekstrom J, Krueger L, Quétier F et al. (2015) No Net Loss and Net Positive Impact Approaches for Biodiversity. Exploring the potential application of these approaches in the commercial agriculture and forestry sectors. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Switzerland. https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2015-003.pdf, checked on 5/28/2020. Accessed 13 June 2022
4. Allen CD, Breshears DD, McDowell NG (2015) On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die-off from hotter drought in the Anthropocene. Ecosphere 6(8):art129. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES15-00203.1
5. Alshehhi A, Nobanee H, Khare N (2018) The impact of sustainability practices on corporate financial performance literature trends and future research potential. Sustainability 10(2):494. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020494
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献