Systemic barriers preventing farmer engagement in the agricultural climate transition: a qualitative study

Author:

Whitton JohnORCID,Carmichael AndrewORCID

Abstract

AbstractFarmers and the agricultural sector are facing an uncertain future, due to rapidly changing agricultural policy and a nexus of commercial, environmental and biodiversity challenges brought on by anthropogenic climate change. Balancing the interests of the farming community and natural environment is generating organisational and personal conflict, rather than effective agricultural adaption and a focus on the net zero transition. In this paper, we consider how farmers and the wider farming community can participate in engagement and decision-making for the transition, on their own terms, whilst ensuring social justice for fair and equitable decision-making. We discuss findings from our research project, that used questionnaires and follow up semi-structured interviews with farmers and farming groups to reveal systemic issues that prevent farmers engaging with the climate transition to net zero during their everyday practice. We highlight the structural relationships that form these barriers and frustrate farmers when designing and implementing farm interventions to agricultural systems during times of transition. Farmers have highlighted barriers to be associated with policy, (uncertain government strategy, landowner bias in government policy and tenancy restrictions, government bureaucracy—particularly environment schemes), commercial (market forces—downward pressure from supermarkets on price points, availability of labour due to seasonal migration restrictions, increasing cost of labour) and interpersonal (succession—uncertain future of the family farm due to limited income). This frustrates the ability of farmers to address climate change through farming practices and undermines the implementation of innovative engagement practices, such as co-produced interventions, in policy and decision-making settings.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference68 articles.

1. Aaltonen K, Jaakko K, Tuomas O (2008) Stakeholder salience in global projects. Int J Project Manage 26(5):509–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.05.004

2. Adams CE, Higginbotham BJ, Rollins D, Taylor RB, Skiles R, Mapston M, Turman S (2005) Regional perspectives and opportunities for feral hog management in Texas. Wildl Soc Bull 33(4):1312–1320. https://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[1312:RPAOFF]2.0.CO;2

3. AHDB (Producer) (2021) Cow’s milk remains a staple in British households. https://ahdb.org.uk/news/consumer-insight-cow-s-milk-remains-a-staple-in-british-households. Accessed 5 Mar 2024

4. Alexander VD, Thomas H, Cronin A, Fielding J, Moran-Ellis J (2008) Mixed methods. In: Gilbert N, Stoneman P (eds) Researching social life, vol 3. SAGE Publications, London, pp 125–144

5. Alexanderson MS, Luke H, Lloyd DJ (2023) Regenerative farming as climate action. J Environ Manage 347:119063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119063

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3